SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Effect sizes can be calculated for studies reporting ranges for outcome variables in systematic reviews
2 references·5 citing·16 second hop
Effect sizes can be calculated for studies reporting ranges for outcome variables in systematic reviews (2007)Effect sizes can be calculated for studie…Statistical Methods for Meta-Analysis (1988)Statistical Methods for Meta-…Statistical Methods for Meta-Analysis. (1986)Statistical Methods for Meta-…The Continuous Fragility Index of Statistically Significant Findings in Studies Based on High Levels of Evidence Comparing Interventions for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome (2025)The Continuous Fragility Inde…Randomized Controlled Trials Assessing Continuous Outcomes for the Use of Platelet‐Rich Plasma in Knee Osteoarthritis Are Statistically Fragile: A Systematic Review (2024)Randomized Controlled Trials …metamedian : An R package for meta‐analyzing studies reporting medians (2023)metamedian : An R package for…Estimation of standard deviations and inverse‐variance weights from an observed range (2021)Estimation of standard deviat…Detecting the skewness of data from the sample size and the five-number summary (2020)Detecting the skewness of dat…Estimating the mean and variance from the median, range, and the size of a sample (2005)Estimating the sample mean and standard deviation from the sample size, median, range and/or interquartile range (2014)Optimally estimating the sample mean from the sample size, median, mid-range, and/or mid-quartile range (2016)Optimally estimating the sample standard deviation from the five‐number summary (2020)Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta‐analysis (2002)Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses (2003)Conducting Meta-Analyses in R with the metafor Package (2010)The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data (1977)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2019)Scientists rise up against statistical significance (2019)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)Meta-analysis in clinical trials (1986)Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology A Proposal for Reporting (2000)A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory. (2006)The Impact of Enhancing Students’ Social and Emotional Learning: A Meta-Analysis of School-Based Universal Interventions (2011)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1988Statistical Methods for Meta-Analysis10,330 cited
  • 1986Statistical Methods for Meta-Analysis.4,785 cited

Cited by

  • 2023metamedian : An R package for meta‐analyzing studies reporting medians62 cited
  • 2020Detecting the skewness of data from the sample size and the five-number summary30 cited
  • 2021Estimation of standard deviations and inverse‐variance weights from an observed range11 cited
  • 2025The Continuous Fragility Index of Statistically Significant Findings in Studies Based on High Levels of Evidence Comparing Interventions for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome7 cited
  • 2024Randomized Controlled Trials Assessing Continuous Outcomes for the Use of Platelet‐Rich Plasma in Knee Osteoarthritis Are Statistically Fragile: A Systematic Review7 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work