SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
The Fate of Epidemiologic Manuscripts
3 references·16 citing·53 second hop
The Fate of Epidemiologic Manuscripts (2007)The Fate of Epidemiologic ManuscriptsUsing the Internet to conduct surveys of health professionals: a valid alternative? (2003)Using the Internet to conduct…The fate of manuscripts rejected by a general medical journal (2000)The fate of manuscripts rejec…Regrets or no regrets? No regrets! The fate of rejected manuscripts (2000)Regrets or no regrets? No reg…Rejected papers in academic publishing: Turning negatives into positives to maximize paper acceptance (2024)Rejected papers in academic p…What does rejection look like? A photovoice study on emotions and coping regarding manuscript rejection (2023)What does rejection look like…Peer review in funding-by-lottery: A systematic overview and expansion (2022)Peer review in funding-by-lot…The science and philosophy of manuscript rejection (2021)The science and philosophy of…Brazilian Publication Profiles: Where and How Brazilian authors publish (2020)Brazilian Publication Profile…Rejection of Manuscripts: Problems and Solutions (2018)Rejection of Manuscripts: Pro…Establishing Sensible and Practical Guidelines for Desk Rejections (2017)Establishing Sensible and Pra…Assessing peer review by gauging the fate of rejected manuscripts: the case of the Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation (2017)Assessing peer review by gaug…Characteristics and fate of orthodontic articles submitted for publication: An exploratory study of the American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics (2015)Characteristics and fate of o…Designing next-generation platforms for evaluating scientific output: what scientists can learn from the social web (2012)Designing next-generation pla…Impact factors in nursing journals (2011)Impact factors in nursing jou…Publishing a Master's Thesis: A Guide for Novice Authors (2010)Publishing a Master's Thesis:…Fate of manuscripts declined by theBritish Journal of Surgery (2010)Fate of manuscripts declined …Editorial Peer Reviewers' Recommendations at a General Medical Journal: Are They Reliable and Do Editors Care? (2010)Editorial Peer Reviewers' Rec…Handling Manuscript Rejection (2009)Handling Manuscript RejectionCommentary: Assessing the quality of observational studies or a lesson from Mars (2007)Commentary: Assessing the qua…The Top 10 Reasons Why Manuscripts Are Not Accepted for Publication (2004)Are reviewers suggested by authors as good as those chosen by editors? Results of a rater-blinded, retrospective study (2006)Differences in Review Quality and Recommendations for Publication Between Peer Reviewers Suggested by Authors or by Editors (2006)Produção do conhecimento em Enfermagem: da idéia da pesquisa à publicação em periódico qualificado (2009)A Difficult Balance: Editorial Peer Review in Medicine (1992)Sense and nonsense about the impact factor (1997)Unpublished Research From a Medical Specialty Meeting (1998)Weighted citation: An indicator of an article's prestige (2010)Weighted citation: An indicator of an article's prestige (2010)Randomized trials published in higher vs. lower impact journals differ in design, conduct, and analysis (2013)Reproducibility of peer review in clinical neuroscience: Is agreement between reviewers any greater than would be expected by chance alone? (2000)Contradicted and Initially Stronger Effects in Highly Cited Clinical Research (2005)A Principal Component Analysis of 39 Scientific Impact Measures (2009)The influence of knowledge-based resources and business scholars’ internationalization strategies on research performance (2013)The use of tailored subheadings was successful in enhancing compliance with CONSORT in a dental journal (2017)Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research (1997)Impact factor: a valid measure of journal quality? (2003)The History and Meaning of the Journal Impact Factor (2006)Rating and Ranking the Role of Bibliometrics and Webometrics in Nursing and Midwifery (2014)Career development tips for today's nursing academic: bibliometrics, altmetrics and social media (2016)Bibliometric maps and co-word analysis of the literature on international cooperation on migration (2021)Communication breakdown in the outpatient referral process (2000)Effects of various methodologic strategies: survey response rates among Canadian physicians and physicians-in-training. (2008)Surveying Clinicians by Web (2013)Global Overview of Response Rates in Patient and Health Care Professional Surveys in Surgery (2020)Peer-review practices of psychological journals: The fate of published articles, submitted again (1982)Editorial Peer Review in Biomedical Publication (1990)How to write a paper for publication (2000)The predictive validity of peer review: A selective review of the judgmental forecasting qualities of peers, and implications for innovation in science (2010)Scientific peer review (2011)Measuring the effectiveness of scientific gatekeeping (2014)Does it take too long to publish research? (2016)Factors influencing the scientific performance of Momentum grant holders: an evaluation of the first 117 research groups (2018)The F3-index. Valuing reviewers for scholarly journals (2018)A study of referencing changes in preprint-publication pairs across multiple fields (2022)Measuring the Quality of Editorial Peer Review (2002)Duration and quality of the peer review process: the author’s perspective (2017)Is Biomedical Research Protected from Predatory Reviewers? (2017)The Clarivate TM Analytics acquisition of Publons – an evolution or commodification of peer review? (2017)Conflicts of Interest Arising from Simultaneous Service by Editors of Competing Journals or Publishers (2021)Harvard Undergraduate Health Policy Review (2023)The dynamics of innovation: from National Systems and “Mode 2” to a Triple Helix of university–industry–government relations (2000)The Access/Impact Problem and the Green and Gold Roads to Open Access (2004)The Oligopoly of Academic Publishers in the Digital Era (2015)Profiles not metrics: the case of Brazilian universities (2021)The 100,000 most influential scientists rank: the underrepresentation of Brazilian women in academia (2021)Funding as a determinant of Citation Impact in Scientific Papers in different countries (2023)The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (1963)Boundary-Work and the Demarcation of Science from Non-Science: Strains and Interests in Professional Ideologies of Scientists (1983)The Diversity–Innovation Paradox in Science (2020)Distrust in grant peer review—reasons and remedies (2023)The costs of competition in distributing scarce research funds (2024)The impact of winning funding on researcher productivity, results from a randomized trial (2024)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2003Using the Internet to conduct surveys of health professionals: a valid alternative?475 cited
  • 2000The fate of manuscripts rejected by a general medical journal71 cited
  • 2000Regrets or no regrets? No regrets! The fate of rejected manuscripts47 cited

Cited by

  • 2011Impact factors in nursing journals58 cited
  • 2009Handling Manuscript Rejection42 cited
  • 2020Brazilian Publication Profiles: Where and How Brazilian authors publish35 cited
  • 2017Establishing Sensible and Practical Guidelines for Desk Rejections33 cited
  • 2017Assessing peer review by gauging the fate of rejected manuscripts: the case of the Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation32 cited
  • 2010Fate of manuscripts declined by theBritish Journal of Surgery31 cited
  • 2022Peer review in funding-by-lottery: A systematic overview and expansion30 cited
  • 2010Editorial Peer Reviewers' Recommendations at a General Medical Journal: Are They Reliable and Do Editors Care?27 cited
  • 2010Publishing a Master's Thesis: A Guide for Novice Authors23 cited
  • 2012Designing next-generation platforms for evaluating scientific output: what scientists can learn from the social web20 cited
  • 2015Characteristics and fate of orthodontic articles submitted for publication: An exploratory study of the American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

19 cited
  • 2021The science and philosophy of manuscript rejection18 cited
  • 2024Rejected papers in academic publishing: Turning negatives into positives to maximize paper acceptance13 cited
  • 2018Rejection of Manuscripts: Problems and Solutions13 cited
  • 2007Commentary: Assessing the quality of observational studies or a lesson from Mars12 cited
  • 2023What does rejection look like? A photovoice study on emotions and coping regarding manuscript rejection11 cited