What social science teaches us about the jury instruction process.Joel D. Lieberman, Bruce Dennis Sales1997-01-01articlePsychology Public Policy and Law108 citationsclosedNo readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.Jury Decision Making ProcessesLegal processes and jurisprudenceJudicial and Constitutional StudiesAbstractNo abstract was published for this record.Citations in this libraryStored only when both papers are in the corpus — 108 citations exist upstream.References1981Psychological Reactance: A Theory of Freedom and Control1994Constructing inferences during narrative text comprehension.1997ATTITUDES AND ATTITUDE CHANGE1974Hindsight-foresight: The effect of outcome knowledge on judgment under uncertainty.1971The American Jury1967The American Jury.1979Making Legal Language Understandable: A Psycholinguistic Study of Jury Instructions1985The Psychology of Evidence and Trial ProcedureCited by2000Understanding the limits of limiting instructions: Social psychological explanations for the failures of instructions to disregard pretrial publicity and other inadmissible evidence.2003Determining damages: The psychology of jury awards.2009Jury decision‐making biases and methods to counter them2007Scientific jury selection.2002Head Over the Heart or Heart Over the Head? Cognitive Experiential Self‐Theory and Extralegal Heuristics in Juror Decision Making12006Breaking boundaries? Sexual consent in the jury room2000Commonsense justice and jury instructions: Instructive and reciprocating connections.2000Flexible corrections of juror judgments: Implications for jury instructions.