The scandal of poor medical research
Abstract
We need less research, better research, and research done for the right reasons What should we think about a doctor who uses the wrong treatment, either wilfully or through ignorance, or who uses the right treatment wrongly (such as by giving the wrong dose of a drug)? Most people would agree that such behaviour was unprofessional, arguably unethical, and certainly unacceptable. What, then, should we think about researchers who use the wrong techniques (either wilfully or in ignorance), use the right techniques wrongly, misinterpret their results, report their results selectively, cite the literature selectively, and draw unjustified conclusions? We should be appalled. Yet numerous studies of the medical literature, in both general and specialist journals, have shown that all of the above phenomena are common.1 2 3 4 5 6 7 This is surely a scandal. When I tell friends outside medicine that many papers published in medical journals are misleading because of methodological weaknesses they are rightly shocked. Huge sums of money are spent annually on research that is seriously flawed through the use of inappropriate designs, unrepresentative samples, small samples, incorrect methods …
Cite this
Douglas G. Altman (1994). The scandal of poor medical research. BMJ. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.308.6924.283
@article{g1994the,
title = {The scandal of poor medical research},
author = {Altman, Douglas G.},
year = {1994},
journal = {BMJ},
doi = {10.1136/bmj.308.6924.283}
}Citations in this library
Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 897 citations exist upstream.