Cyber-Terror—Looming Threat or Phantom Menace? The Framing of the US Cyber-Threat Debate

Abstract

For some years, experts and government officials have warned of cyber-terrorism as a looming threat to national security. However, if we define cyber-terror as an attack or series of attacks that is carried out by terrorists, that instills fear by effects that are destructive or disruptive, and that has a political, religious, or ideological motivation, then none of the disruptive cyber-incidents of the last years qualify as examples of cyber-terrorism. So why has this fear been so persistent? Instead of trying to answer how long cyber-terror is likely to remain a fictional scenario, this paper analyzes the US cyber-terror discourse from a constructivist security studies angle: It looks at how cyber-threats in general, and cyber-terror in particular are framed, and speculates on characteristics that are responsible for the rapid and considerable political impact of the widespread conceptualization of aspects of information technology as a security problem in the 1990s.

Cite this work

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 123 citations exist upstream.

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.