Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Same numbers, different meanings: How numeracy influences the importance of numbers for pro-social behavior

16 references·16 citing·41 second hopsampled

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop· second hop is a sample of the most-cited connections

References

2004Heuristics and Biases: The Psychology of Intuitive Judgment3,536 cited
1992The altruism question: toward a social-psychological answer2,405 cited
2002The Affect Heuristic2,357 cited
2004An Online Recruitment System for Economic Experiments1,292 cited
2006Numeracy and Decision Making1,178 cited
1996The Evaluability Hypothesis: An Explanation for Preference Reversals between Joint and Separate Evaluations of Alternatives1,139 cited
2007“If I look at the mass I will never act”: Psychic numbing and genocide832 cited
2005The “identified victim” effect: an identified group, or just a single individual?797 cited
1997Explaining the Identifiable Victim Effect742 cited
2007Agreeableness, empathy, and helping: A person × situation perspective.701 cited
2004Music, Pandas, and Muggers: On the Affective Psychology of Value.654 cited
2010If I Look at the Mass I Will Never Act: Psychic Numbing and Genocide622 cited
2007Numeracy, ratio bias, and denominator neglect in judgments of risk and probability486 cited
2009Cognitive abilities and superior decision making under risk: A protocol analysis and process model evaluation428 cited
1997Insensitivity to the Value of Human Life: A Study of Psychophysical Numbing

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

421 cited

2010General Evaluability Theory409 cited

Cited by

2014Emotional reactions, perceived impact and perceived responsibility mediate the identifiable victim effect, proportion dominance effect and in-group effect respectively184 cited
2019Helping one or helping many? A theoretical integration and meta-analytic review of the compassion fade literature119 cited
2016Investigating the Effects of Anger and Guilt on Unethical Behavior: A Dual-Process Approach99 cited
2012Valuations of human lives: normative expectations and psychological mechanisms of (ir)rationality38 cited
2020How representations of number and numeracy predict decision paradoxes: A fuzzy‐trace theory approach34 cited
2016How to present donations: the moderating role of numeracy in cause-related marketing31 cited
2021Seven (weak and strong) helping effects systematically tested in separate evaluation, joint evaluation and forced choice27 cited
2017Choice-justifications after allocating resources in helping dilemmas22 cited
2018The loss‐bet paradox: Actuaries, accountants, and other numerate people rate numerically inferior gambles as superior22 cited
2016Proportion dominance in valuing lives: The role of deliberative thinking19 cited
2018Trading Under the Influence: The Effects of Psychological Ownership on Economic Decision-Making18 cited
2021Numeracy, numeric attention, and number use in judgment and choice16 cited
2018Approximate Number Processing Skills Contribute to Decision Making Under Objective Risk: Interactions With Executive Functions and Objective Numeracy14 cited
2023Do colored cells in risk matrices affect decision‐making and risk perception? Insights from randomized controlled studies13 cited
2023Revisiting the Links Between Numeracy and Decision Making: Replication Registered Report of Peters et al. (2006) With an Extension Examining Confidence9 cited
2023Better decision making through objective numeracy and numeric self-efficacy8 cited