SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Nominal and interactive groups: Effects of preinstruction and deliberations on decisions and evidence recall in complex trials.
3 references·7 citing·38 second hop
Nominal and interactive groups: Effects of preinstruction and deliberations on decisions and evidence recall in complex trials. (1995)Nominal and interactive groups: Effects o…Getting Inside the Black Box: Toward A Better Understanding of Civil Jury Behavior (1987)Getting Inside the Black Box:…Psychology of Group Influence (1981)Psychology of Group InfluenceProgress in social psychology (1980)Progress in social psychologyKeep your bias to yourself: How deliberating with differently biased others affects mock-jurors’ guilt decisions, perceptions of the defendant, memories, and evidence interpretation. (2017)Keep your bias to yourself: H…The impact of note taking style and note availability at retrieval on mock jurors’ recall and recognition of trial information (2015)The impact of note taking sty…Predicting guilt judgments and verdict change using a measure of pretrial bias in a videotaped mock trial with deliberating jurors (2009)Predicting guilt judgments an…When Juries Fail to Comply with the Law: Biased Evidence Processing in Individual and Group Decision Making (2001)When Juries Fail to Comply wi…Procedural Mechanisms and Jury Behavior (2001)Procedural Mechanisms and Jur…Instructing jurors on general damages in personal injury cases: Problems and possibilities. (2000)Instructing jurors on general…The Plaintiff Bias in Mock Civil Jury Decision Making: Consensus Requirements, Information Format and Amount of Consensus (1999)The Plaintiff Bias in Mock Ci…The Handbook of Social Psychology (1969)Judgment under Uncertainty (1982)Judgment under uncertainty: Causality and attribution (1982)Group Decision-Making (2019)Listening and note taking. (1972)Explanation-based decision making: Effects of memory structure on judgment. (1988)The ecological validity of jury simulations: Is the jury still out? (1999)When a corporation rapes: perceptions of rape in civil court for corporate defendants (2017)Biased assimilation and attitude polarization: The effects of prior theories on subsequently considered evidence. (1979)Communication and Persuasion (1986)The Social Psychology of Procedural Justice (1988)The Digital Technology Revolution and Its Effect on the Market for Copyrighted Works: Is History Repeating Itself? (2004)Behavioral sciences and the law. (1966)Psychological Reactance: A Theory of Freedom and Control (1981)Mental contamination and mental correction: Unwanted influences on judgments and evaluations. (1994)Paradoxes of proof and punishment: Psychological pitfalls in judicial decision making (2006)All anchors are not created equal: The effects of per diem versus lump sum requests on pain and suffering awards. (2009)Psychological Injuries and Legal Decision Making in Civil Cases: What We Know and What We Do not Know (2013)Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement. (1966)Attitude-behavior relations: A theoretical analysis and review of empirical research. (1977)The case for motivated reasoning. (1990)The Utility of Scientific Jury Selection (2011)Predicting verdicts using pre‐trial attitudes and standard of proof (2013)Verdict spotting: investigating the effects of juror bias, evidence anchors and verdict system in jurors (2021)Group decision making and normative versus informational influence: Effects of type of issue and assigned decision rule. (1987)Many hands make light the work: The causes and consequences of social loafing. (1979)The emerging conceptualization of groups as information processors. (1997)Shared Reality: Experiencing Commonality with others' Inner States about the World (2009)From the Headlines to the Jury Room: An Examination of the Impact of Pretrial Publicity on Jurors and Juries (2018)Jury simulation studies: To exclude or not to exclude participants based on a lack of comprehension of the case? (2020)The role of defendant gender on juror decision-making within a mock sex trafficking case among a jury-eligible community sample (2021)Knowing what to think by knowing who you are: Self‐categorization and the nature of norm formation, conformity and group polarization* (1990)Panacea or Panopticon? (1994)Breaching or Building Social Boundaries? (1998)Jury Decision Making (1992)Third-party punishment: Retribution or deterrence? (2018)Effects of information load and percentage of shared information on the dissemination of unshared information during group discussion. (1987)Effects of Task Experience and Group Experience on Group Performance, Member Ability, and Recognition of Expertise (1997)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1981Psychology of Group Influence852 cited
  • 1980Progress in social psychology752 cited
  • 1987Getting Inside the Black Box: Toward A Better Understanding of Civil Jury Behavior29 cited

Cited by

  • 2009Predicting guilt judgments and verdict change using a measure of pretrial bias in a videotaped mock trial with deliberating jurors27 cited
  • 2000Instructing jurors on general damages in personal injury cases: Problems and possibilities.24 cited
  • 2017Keep your bias to yourself: How deliberating with differently biased others affects mock-jurors’ guilt decisions, perceptions of the defendant, memories, and evidence interpretation.23 cited
  • 2001When Juries Fail to Comply with the Law: Biased Evidence Processing in Individual and Group Decision Making17 cited
  • 2015The impact of note taking style and note availability at retrieval on mock jurors’ recall and recognition of trial information16 cited
  • 2001Procedural Mechanisms and Jury Behavior14 cited
  • 1999The Plaintiff Bias in Mock Civil Jury Decision Making: Consensus Requirements, Information Format and Amount of Consensus12 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work