Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

How to increase the potential policy impact of environmental science research

12 references·3 citing·49 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

2011The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials33,776 cited
2010Dissemination and publication of research findings: an updated review of related biases1,039 cited
2010The rate of growth in scientific publication and the decline in coverage provided by Science Citation Index964 cited
2006Bias in Clinical Intervention Research636 cited
2010Transparent and accurate reporting increases reliability, utility, and impact of your research: reporting guidelines and the EQUATOR Network589 cited
1993The Design and Analysis of Research Studies.231 cited
1990The Importance of Reporting Statistical Power: The Forest Decline and Acidic Deposition Example184 cited
2014On the use of systematic reviews to inform environmental policies137 cited
2014Quality assessment tools for evidence from environmental science107 cited
1996Obtaining information accurately and quickly: are structured abstracts more efficient?72 cited
2013The evolution of assessing bias in Cochrane systematic reviews of interventions: celebrating methodological contributions of the Cochrane Collaboration62 cited
2013Research: A standard for policy-relevant science32 cited

Cited by

2020Analisis Kebijakan Penanganan Wabah Covid-19: Pengalaman Indonesia145 cited
2020

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

Prepare Scientists to Engage in Science‐Policy

12 cited

2021Acting in the face of evidentiary ambiguity, bias, and absence arising from systematic reviews in applied environmental science12 cited