An Analysis of the Influence of the Quantitative Concepts Subtest in the Woodcock-Johnson Scholastic Aptitude Clusters

Kevin S. McGrew

2 citations0/0 files storedJournal of Psychoeducational Assessment

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Psychological Testing and Assessment Psychometric Methodologies and Testing Cognitive Abilities and Testing

Abstract

The Woodcock-Johnson Battery contains four Scholastic Aptitude clusters designed to predict achievement. Based on stepwise multiple regression development procedures, the subtests within these clusters are weighted differently. Concerns regarding the inclusion of the Quantitative Concepts subtest in two of these aptitude clusters were investigated in a referral sample (N = 386). The results suggest that the achievement content of Quantitative Concepts subtest, particularly because of its relatively high weighting, may inappropriately affect the scores on the Written Language and Knowledge Aptitude clusters. Implications for interpretation are discussed.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 2 citations exist upstream.

References

1985The ninth mental measurements yearbook 1981Woodcock-Johnson psycho-Educational battery 1982A Theoretical Analysis of the Performance of Learning Disabled Students on the Woodcock-Johnson Psycho-educational Battery 1979Validity of the Woodcock-Johnson Psycho-Educational Battery with Learning Disabled Students.

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.