Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Whose failure, Reid's or Hume's?

14 references·1 citing·30 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

1739A Treatise of Human Nature9,842 cited
1777An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding972 cited
1958The Principles of Art412 cited
1932The letters of David Hume377 cited
1959A Hundred Years of Philosophy.304 cited
1978David Hume, A Treatise of Human Nature247 cited
1987An Essay on the Nature and Immutability of Truth, in Opposition to Sophistry and Scepticism234 cited
1964The philosophical works122 cited
1976Thomas Reid: Critical Interpretations78 cited
1995The enigmatic parting shot : what was Hume's "Compleat answer to Dr Reid and to that bigotted silly fellow, Beattie"?34 cited
1986David Hume on Thomas Reid's An Inquiry into the Human Mind, On the Principles of Common Sense: A New Letter to Hugh Blair from July 176219 cited
1987Hume vs. Reid on Ideas: The New Hume Letter17 cited
1995The failure of Thomas Reid's attack on David Hume15 cited
1984David Hume: Common-Sense Moralist, Sceptical Metaphysician.10 cited

Cited by

1999The Hume Literature, 19980 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work