A Syntactic Universal and Its Consequences

Abstract

This article investigates the Final-over-Final Constraint (FOFC): a head-initial category cannot be the immediate structural complement of a head-final category within the same extended projection. This universal cannot be formulated without reference to the kind of hierarchical structure generated by standard models of phrase structure. First, we document the empirical evidence: logically possible but crosslinguistically unattested combinations of head-final and head-initial orders. Second, we propose a theory, based on a version of Kayne’s (1994) Linear Correspondence Axiom, where FOFC is an effect of the distribution of a movement-triggering feature in extended projections, subject to Relativized Minimality.

Cite this

Theresa Biberauer, Anders Holmberg, Ian Roberts (2014). A Syntactic Universal and Its Consequences. Linguistic Inquiry. https://doi.org/10.1162/ling_a_00153

@article{theresa2014a,
  title  = {A Syntactic Universal and Its Consequences},
  author = {Biberauer, Theresa and Holmberg, Anders and Roberts, Ian},
  year   = {2014},
  journal = {Linguistic Inquiry},
  doi    = {10.1162/ling_a_00153}
}

Citations in this library

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 389 citations exist upstream.

References

Cited by