SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Involving the public in rationing decisions. The experience of citizens juries
2 references·16 citing·44 second hop
Involving the public in rationing decisions. The experience of citizens juries (1999)Involving the public in rationing decisio…European Health Care Reform: Analysis of Current Strategies (1999)European Health Care Reform: …Health care rationing: the public's debate (1996)Health care rationing: the pu…Small-Scale Deliberation and Mass Democracy: A Systematic Review of the Spillover Effects of Deliberative Minipublics (2021)Small-Scale Deliberation and …What can deliberative approaches bring to the monetary valuation of ecosystem services? A literature review (2015)What can deliberative approac…Public Deliberation in Health Policy and Bioethics: Mapping an emerging, interdisciplinary field (2013)Public Deliberation in Health…Disability and deliberative democracy: towards involving the whole human spectrum in public deliberation (2013)Disability and deliberative d…Deliberative research as a tool to make value judgements (2013)Deliberative research as a to…Strengthening fairness, transparency and accountability in health care priority setting at district level in Tanzania (2011)Strengthening fairness, trans…Role of patient and public participation in health technology assessment and coverage decisions (2011)Role of patient and public pa…Participation Bias, Durable Opinion Shifts and Sabotage through Withdrawal in Citizens' Juries (2009)Participation Bias, Durable O…Making policy decisions about population screening for breast cancer: The role of citizens’ deliberation (2007)Making policy decisions about…Choosing Healthplans All Together: A Deliberative Exercise for Allocating Limited Health Care Resources (2005)Choosing Healthplans All Toge…Hearing Voices: Negotiating Representation Claims in Public Deliberation (2004)Hearing Voices: Negotiating R…Political Parties and the Rhetoric and Realities of Democratization (2003)Political Parties and the Rhe…New Forms of Democracy? Reform and Transformation of Democratic Institutions (2003)New Forms of Democracy? Refor…Involving the general public in priority setting: experiences from Australia (2003)Involving the general public …Democratic Publics and Democratic Institutions (2003)Democratic Publics and Democr…Citizens and rationing: analysis of a European survey (1999)Citizens and rationing: analy…Dismantling the Welfare State? (1994)Dismantling the welfare state?: Reagan, Thatcher, and the politics of retrenchment (1995)Poverty, out-of-pocket payments and access to health care: evidence from Tajikistan (2003)Getting Health Reform Right (2008)Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL),Youth Self-Report (YSR) and Teacher's Report Form(TRF): an overview of the development of the original and Brazilian versions (2013)Valuing public goods: The purchase of moral satisfaction (1992)Contingent Valuation: Controversies and Evidence (2001)Economic Valuation with Stated Preference Techniques: a Manual (2002)Deliberative Democratic Monetary Valuation to implement the Ecosystem Approach (2016)Coefficient Alpha and the Internal Structure of Tests (1951)Essentials of Psychological Testing (1960)Democracy and disagreement (1997)Priorities of Low-Income Urban Residents for Interventions to Address the Socio-Economic Determinants of Health (2010)Power Sharing, Capacity Building, and Evolving Roles in ELSI: The Center for the Ethics of Indigenous Genomic Research (2020)Deliberative engagement methods on health care priority-setting in a rural South African community (2021)Culture Shift in Advanced Industrial Society (1990)Citizens and the State (1998)Cross-national agreement on disability weights: the European Disability Weights Project (2003)Private Health Insurance in OECD Countries (2004)Priority setting in Indigenous health: assessing priority setting process and criteria that should guide the health system to improve Indigenous Australian health (2014)Does deliberation make a difference? Results from a citizens panel study of health goals priority setting (2003)Bringing ‘the public’ into health technology assessment and coverage policy decisions: From principles to practice (2006)Centralized Drug Review Processes In Australia, Canada, New Zealand, And The United Kingdom (2006)Assessing the Added Value of Health Technologies: Reconciling Different Perspectives (2012)Factors and situations influencing the value of patient preference studies along the medical product lifecycle: a literature review (2018)Dealing With Medical Practice Variations: A Proposal for Action (1984)The Condition of Postmodernity (1991)Engaging the public in priority‐setting for health technology assessment: findings from a citizens’ jury (2008)Social values in health priority setting: a conceptual framework (2012)Public views on principles for health care priority setting: Findings of a European cross-country study using Q methodology (2014)A Pure Theory of Local Expenditures (1956)Exit, Voice and Loyalty: Responses to Decline in Firms, Organizations, and States. (1970)Bowling alone (2000)Candidate Selection Procedures in Transitional Polities (2008)Citizen Participation and Democratic Deficits: Considerations from the Perspective of Democratic Theory (2009)The Theory and Practice of Citizens’ Juries (1999)Consensus Conferences as Deliberative Democracy (2000)Influencing health policy through public deliberation: Lessons learned from two decades of Citizens'/community juries (2017)Fostering Ethical, Legal, and Social Implications Research in Tribal Communities: The Center for the Ethics of Indigenous Genomic Research (2019)Resource allocation, social values and the QALY: a review of the debate and empirical evidence (2002)How do Zimbabweans value health states? (2003)Draagvlak door interactief bestuur : fictie of feit?! (2009)The European Court of Human Rights, Amicus Curiae, and Violence against Women (2016)Sortition, its advocates and its critics: An empirical analysis of citizens’ and MPs’ support for random selection as a democratic reform proposal (2020)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1999European Health Care Reform: Analysis of Current Strategies330 cited
  • 1996Health care rationing: the public's debate222 cited

Cited by

  • 2003Involving the general public in priority setting: experiences from Australia159 cited
  • 2015What can deliberative approaches bring to the monetary valuation of ecosystem services? A literature review109 cited
  • 2013Public Deliberation in Health Policy and Bioethics: Mapping an emerging, interdisciplinary field99 cited
  • 1999Citizens and rationing: analysis of a European survey96 cited
  • 2011Role of patient and public participation in health technology assessment and coverage decisions94 cited
  • 2005Choosing Healthplans All Together: A Deliberative Exercise for Allocating Limited Health Care Resources92 cited
  • 2003New Forms of Democracy? Reform and Transformation of Democratic Institutions89 cited
  • 2003Political Parties and the Rhetoric and Realities of Democratization77 cited
  • 2021Small-Scale Deliberation and Mass Democracy: A Systematic Review of the Spillover Effects of Deliberative Minipublics75 cited
  • 2007Making policy decisions about population screening for breast cancer: The role of citizens’ deliberation72 cited
  • 2004Hearing Voices: Negotiating Representation Claims in Public Deliberation70 cited
  • 2003Democratic Publics and Democratic Institutions

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

69 cited
  • 2009Participation Bias, Durable Opinion Shifts and Sabotage through Withdrawal in Citizens' Juries68 cited
  • 2013Deliberative research as a tool to make value judgements68 cited
  • 2011Strengthening fairness, transparency and accountability in health care priority setting at district level in Tanzania64 cited
  • 2013Disability and deliberative democracy: towards involving the whole human spectrum in public deliberation42 cited