Preferential Treatment in Television Interviewing: Evidence from Nonverbal Behavior

Elisha Y. Babad

24 citations0/0 files storedPolitical Communication

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Media Studies and Communication Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies Media Influence and Politics

Abstract

Implicit and explicit norms in broadcasting require that interviewees be treated in a fair and objective manner and given an equal chance to express themselves, regardless of interviewers' personal liking or preference. Nonverbal behavior of seven Israeli televison interviewers was investigated to discover whether they treated politicians from opposing camps and other interviewees in a differential or fair manner. Very brief clips (averaging 7 seconds) showing the interviewer alone were judged by American students who had no comprehension of speech content. In Study 1, all six interviewers were found to demonstrate differential nonverbal behavior toward interviewees, and four of them treated Labor versus Likud camp politicians in a differential manner. A range of individual differences in effect magnitudes of the differential behavior effects was found. Study 2 focused on two lengthy parallel interviews conducted by a prominent interviewer during the 1996 election campaign with the two candidates for prime minister. The interviewer's nonverbal behavior was found to be blatantly preferential in favor of one candidate. Study 3 examined micro behaviors contributing to the formation of global negative/positive impressions. Correlational analyses yielded several global (presumably universal) mediators: smiling, rhythmical beating hand movements, leaning forward, sarcasm, and attempts to regulate the interviewee. Each interviewer was found to demonstrate a unique personal style in which different nonverbal behaviors mediated the overall impression. The tentative conclusion is that more dominant and aggressive interviewers show more differential/preferential behavior. Social and ethical implications, as well as implications for nonverbal research, are discussed.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 24 citations exist upstream.

References

1969The Repertoire of Nonverbal Behavior: Categories, Origins, Usage, and Coding 1992Thin slices of expressive behavior as predictors of interpersonal consequences: A meta-analysis.1969Nonverbal Leakage and Clues to Deception †1993Half a minute: Predicting teacher evaluations from thin slices of nonverbal behavior and physical attractiveness.1993The Evolution of Agenda-Setting Research: Twenty-Five Years in the Marketplace of Ideas 1992Nonverbal behavior and self-presentation.1974News as Purposive Behavior: On the Strategic Use of Routine Events, Accidents, and Scandals 1979Sensitivity to Nonverbal Communication: The PONS Test

Cited by

2012Media literacy and media bias: Are media literacy students less susceptible to nonverbal judgment biases?2020Written All Over Their Faces: Neutrality and Nonverbal Expression in Sandy Hook Coverage

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.