Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Why Most Published Research Findings Are False: Author's Reply to Goodman and Greenland

7 references·12 citing·43 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

2005Why Most Published Research Findings Are False10,471 cited
2005Why Most Published Research Findings Are False4,702 cited
2005Contradicted and Initially Stronger Effects in Highly Cited Clinical Research1,465 cited
2006Bias in Clinical Intervention Research636 cited
2006Evolution and Translation of Research Findings: From Bench to Where129 cited
2007Selection in Reported Epidemiological Risks: An Empirical Assessment115 cited
2007Why Most Published Research Findings Are False: Problems in the Analysis109 cited

Cited by

2015A Central Theory of Biology67 cited
2019Biases and imperatives in handling medical technology34 cited
2008Some main problems eroding the credibility and relevance of randomized trials.30 cited
2013Availability of results from clinical research: Failing policy efforts23 cited
2022How to trust a scientist21 cited
2018Hanging on to the Edges19 cited
20184. What is cultural evolution like?15 cited
2007Reporting of Systematic Reviews: The Challenge of Genetic Association Studies12 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

2017

Psychological Science's Aversion to the Null, and Why Many of the Things You Think Are True, Aren't

12 cited

2013Multiple testing in orthopedic literature: a common problem?10 cited

2023Mind the unknowns5 cited

2015Current and New Developments in Psychological Testing for Child Custody Disputes5 cited