SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Evolution of reports of randomised clinical trials in plastic surgery
16 references·0 citing·39 second hop
Evolution of reports of randomised clinical trials in plastic surgery (2011)Evolution of reports of randomised clinic…Evidence-Based Plastic Surgery (2009)Evidence-Based Plastic SurgeryRandomized Controlled Trials in Plastic Surgery: A 20-Year Review of Reporting Standards, Methodologic Quality, and Impact (2008)Randomized Controlled Trials …Evidence-Based Plastic Surgery (2008)Evidence-Based Plastic SurgerySystematic Reviews: A Primer for Plastic Surgery Research (2007)Systematic Reviews: A Primer …Impact Factors and Publication Times for Plastic Surgery Journals (2007)Impact Factors and Publicatio…Randomised clinical trials in plastic surgery: Survey of output and quality of reporting (2006)Randomised clinical trials in…Publications of plastic surgery research 1972 through 2004: a longitudinal trend analysis of three international journals (2006)Publications of plastic surge…Quality of Reports of Randomized Clinical Trials in Plastic Surgery (2005)Quality of Reports of Randomi…Analysis of Publications in Three Plastic Surgery Journals for the Year 2002 (2004)Analysis of Publications in T…The CONSORT Statement: Revised Recommendations for Improving the Quality of Reports of Parallel-Group Randomized Trials (2001)The CONSORT Statement: Revise…The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)The CONSORT statement: revise…Randomized, controlled trials in surgery (2001)Randomized, controlled trials…Assessing the Quality of Randomized Trials (1999)Assessing the Quality of Rand…The Delphi List (1998)The Delphi ListAssessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)Assessing the quality of repo…Audit of reports of randomised clinical trials published in one journal over 45 years (1995)Audit of reports of randomise…Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials (1995)Systematic reviews: CRD's guidance for undertaking reviews in health care (2010)The COSMIN checklist for assessing the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties of health status measurement instruments: an international Delphi study (2010)The COSMIN study reached international consensus on taxonomy, terminology, and definitions of measurement properties for health-related patient-reported outcomes (2010)Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability. (1979)Health Measurement Scales: A Practical Guide to Their Development and Use (1989)Empirical Evidence of Bias (1995)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data (1977)The evidence base for oral and maxillofacial surgery: 10-year analysis of two journals (2010)Evidence-Based Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery (2013)An Evaluation of Reporting Guidelines and Clinical Trial Registry Requirements Among Plastic Surgery Journals (2018)Publication bias in clinical research (1991)Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement (1999)Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology A Proposal for Reporting (2000)Comprehensive Systematic Review for Advanced Nursing Practice (2011)Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (2011)Types of studies and research design (2016)Meta-Analyses of Randomized Controlled Trials (1987)Assessing the quality of randomized controlled trials: An annotated bibliography of scales and checklists (1995)Interrater Reliability of the Modified Jadad Quality Scale for Systematic Reviews of Alzheimer’s Disease Drug Trials (2001)Correlation of Quality Measures With Estimates of Treatment Effect in Meta-analyses of Randomized Controlled Trials (2002)Recommendations by Cochrane Review Groups for assessment of the risk of bias in studies (2008)Epidemiology in Medicine. (1988)The Reporting of Randomized Clinical Trials Using a Surgical Intervention Is in Need of Immediate Improvement (2006)Plastic Surgery Classics: Characteristics of 50 Top-Cited Articles in Four Plastic Surgery Journals since 1946 (2008)Evidence-Based Medicine, Systematic Reviews, and Guidelines in Interventional Pain Management: Part 4: Observational Studies (2009)Level of Evidence in Four Selected Rehabilitation Journals (2011)Quality of reporting according to the CONSORT, STROBE and Timmer instrument at the American Burn Association (ABA) annual meetings 2000 and 2008 (2011)Deficiencies of effectiveness of intervention studies in veterinary medicine: a cross-sectional survey of ten leading veterinary and medical journals (2016)Levels of Evidence in Cosmetic Surgery (2013)A Systematic Review of Surgical Randomized Controlled Trials (2016)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies (2007)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007)Assessing the quality of controlled clinical trials (2001)Towards Complete and Accurate Reporting of Studies of Diagnostic Accuracy: The STARD Initiative (2003)Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups (2007)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1996Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary?17,580 cited
  • 2001The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials5,372 cited
  • 2001The CONSORT Statement: Revised Recommendations for Improving the Quality of Reports of Parallel-Group Randomized Trials2,545 cited
  • 1998The Delphi List2,379 cited
  • 1999Assessing the Quality of Randomized Trials649 cited
  • 2001Randomized, controlled trials in surgery201 cited
  • 2007Systematic Reviews: A Primer for Plastic Surgery Research68 cited
  • 2006Randomised clinical trials in plastic surgery: Survey of output and quality of reporting46 cited
  • 2008Randomized Controlled Trials in Plastic Surgery: A 20-Year Review of Reporting Standards, Methodologic Quality, and Impact43 cited
  • 2008Evidence-Based Plastic Surgery31 cited
  • 2009Evidence-Based Plastic Surgery30 cited
  • 2005Quality of Reports of Randomized Clinical Trials in Plastic Surgery29 cited
  • 2006Publications of plastic surgery research 1972 through 2004: a longitudinal trend analysis of three international journals27 cited
  • 2007Impact Factors and Publication Times for Plastic Surgery Journals21 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

2004
Analysis of Publications in Three Plastic Surgery Journals for the Year 2002
19 cited
  • 1995Audit of reports of randomised clinical trials published in one journal over 45 years19 cited
  • Cited by

    No citing works inside the corpus for this window.