Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

A concept in search of a definition: The effects of reasonable doubt instructions on certainty of guilt standards and jury verdicts.

7 references·15 citing·43 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

1984Essentials of Behavioral Research: Methods and Data Analysis3,889 cited
1976Guilt beyond a reasonable doubt: Effects of concept definition and assigned decision rule on the judgments of mock jurors.182 cited
1971Quantifying Burdens of Proof155 cited
1979On the requirements of proof: The timing of judicial instruction and mock juror verdicts.132 cited
1990The Law and Psychology of Jury Instructions99 cited
1978Severity of prescribed penalty and mock jurors' verdicts.89 cited
1985Legal vs. quantified definitions of standards of proof.82 cited

Cited by

2012Observing Court Responses to Victims of Rape and Sexual Assault73 cited
2007How a “Reasonable Doubt” Instruction Affects Decisions of Guilt46 cited
2010Getting to (not) guilty: examining jurors' deliberative processes in, and beyond, the context of a mock rape trial43 cited
2017Deconstructing the simplification of jury instructions: How simplifying the features of complexity affects jurors’ application of instructions.38 cited
2000The conflict between precision and flexibility in explaining "beyond a reasonable doubt".36 cited
2008Preponderance of the Evidence versus Intime Conviction: A Behavioural Perspective on a Conflict Between American and Continental European Law31 cited
2007

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

The Language of Consent in Rape Law

31 cited

2016“It will be your duty…:” The Psychology of Criminal Jury Instructions26 cited

1999Effects of reasonable doubt definition and inclusion of a lesser charge on jury verdicts.25 cited

2006Paradoxes of proof and punishment: Psychological pitfalls in judicial decision making24 cited

2013The Probability of Guilt in Criminal Cases: Are People Aware of Being ‘Beyond Reasonable Doubt’?19 cited

2013Predicting verdicts using pre‐trial attitudes and standard of proof17 cited

2001Procedural Mechanisms and Jury Behavior14 cited

2024The Epistemic Role of Diversity in Juries: An Agent-Based Model13 cited

2015Instructions on reasonable doubt: Defining the standard of proof and the juror’s task.13 cited