SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
The bottom-up approach to integrative validity: A new perspective for program evaluation
16 references·16 citing·31 second hopsampled
The bottom-up approach to integrative validity: A new perspective for program evaluation (2009)The bottom-up approach to integrative val…Diffusion of Innovations 1 (2019)Diffusion of Innovations 1Utilization-Focused Evaluation (2018)Utilization-Focused EvaluationFourth Generation Evaluation (2014)Fourth Generation EvaluationSAGE Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social & Behavioral Research (2010)SAGE Handbook of Mixed Method…Diffusion of innovations. (2003)Diffusion of innovations.The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)The CONSORT statement: revise…The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel group randomized trials (2001)The CONSORT statement: revise…Reducing Risks for Mental Disorders: Frontiers for Preventive Intervention Research (1995)Reducing Risks for Mental Dis…Reducing Risks for Mental Disorders (1994)Reducing Risks for Mental Dis…Theory-driven evaluations (1990)Theory-driven evaluationsFourth-Generation Evaluation (1988)Fourth-Generation EvaluationEfficacy and effectiveness trials (and other phases of research) in the development of health promotion programs (1986)Efficacy and effectiveness tr…Designing Evaluations of Educational and Social Programs. (1983)Designing Evaluations of Educ…Program evaluation: Methods and case studies (1981)Program evaluation: Methods a…Evaluation: A Systematic Approach (1979)Evaluation: A Systematic Appr…Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Research (1963)Experimental and Quasi-Experi…Assessing the Time for Living and Caring (TLC) Study: Mixed-Methods Feasibility Study of a Web-Based Caregiver Intervention to Improve Respite (2025)Assessing the Time for Living…Understanding the complexity of population health interventions: assessing intervention system theory (ISyT) (2021)Understanding the complexity …Suggesting a policy-driven approach to validation in the context of the Test of Proficiency in Korean (TOPIK) (2021)Suggesting a policy-driven ap…Biologically grounded scientific methods: The challenges ahead for combating epidemics (2021)Biologically grounded scienti…Researching Ageing (2020)Researching AgeingApplying the nutrition education DESIGN procedure to the development of the In Defence of Food Curriculum (2019)Applying the nutrition educat…Evidence and Evidence-Based Practices: Are We There Yet? (2017)Evidence and Evidence-Based P…Interfacing theories of program with theories of evaluation for advancing evaluation practice: Reductionism, systems thinking, and pragmatic synthesis (2016)Interfacing theories of progr…External Validity: The Next Step for Systematic Reviews? (2016)External Validity: The Next S…Effectiveness of Large-Scale, State-Sponsored Language and Literacy Professional Development on Early Childhood Educator Outcomes (2016)Effectiveness of Large-Scale,…Evolutionary Evaluation: Implications for evaluators, researchers, practitioners, funders and the evidence-based program mandate (2014)Evolutionary Evaluation: Impl…Zwischen Akzeptanz und Abwehr: Das Verhältnis von Wissenschaft und Praxis am Beispiel der Begleitung und Evaluation von Programmen und Projekten (2012)Zwischen Akzeptanz und Abwehr…Theory-driven evaluation: Conceptual framework, application and advancement (2012)Theory-driven evaluation: Con…The mixing of methods: A three-step process for improving rigour in impact evaluations (2012)The mixing of methods: A thre…Assessing program outcomes from the bottom‐up approach: An innovative perspective to outcome evaluation (2011)Assessing program outcomes fr…Evidence-based practices in the field of intellectual and developmental disabilities: An international consensus approach (2010)Evidence-based practices in t…Health Measurement Scales: A Practical Guide to Their Development and Use (1989)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology A Proposal for Reporting (2000)Core outcome domains for chronic pain clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendations (2003)Improving the Reporting Quality of Nonrandomized Evaluations of Behavioral and Public Health Interventions: The TREND Statement (2004)Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and Elaboration (2007)Situation Ethics: The New Morality (1966)The Argumentative Turn in Policy Analysis and Planning (1993)Developmental Evaluation: Applying Complexity Concepts to Enhance Innovation and Use (2010)Purposeful Sampling in Qualitative Research Synthesis (2011)Empirical Evidence of Bias (1995)Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials (1995)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies (2007)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)Competing paradigms in qualitative research. (1994)Mixed Methods Research: A Research Paradigm Whose Time Has Come (2004)Thematic Analysis (2017)The Strength of Weak Ties (1973)User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward A Unified View1 (2003)Toward a Definition of Mixed Methods Research (2007)Journal article reporting standards for qualitative primary, qualitative meta-analytic, and mixed methods research in psychology: The APA Publications and Communications Board task force report. (2018)Discovering the Future of the Case Study. Method in Evaluation Research (1994)Best Practices or Best Guesses? Assessing the Efficacy of Corporate Affirmative Action and Diversity Policies (2006)Reviewing the evidence on how teacher professional development affects student achievement (2007)Is innovation always beneficial? A meta-analysis of the relationship between innovation and performance in SMEs (2010)Diffusion of Innovations (2015)Mobile payment: Understanding the determinants of customer adoption and intention to recommend the technology (2016)Determining Validity in Qualitative Inquiry (2000)A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory. (2006)Qualitative Quality: Eight “Big-Tent” Criteria for Excellent Qualitative Research (2010)
this work references cited by second hop· second hop is a sample of the most-cited connections

References

  • 2019Diffusion of Innovations 137,320 cited
  • 1963Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Research15,090 cited
  • 2003Diffusion of innovations.13,723 cited
  • 2014Fourth Generation Evaluation7,250 cited
  • 2010SAGE Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social & Behavioral Research6,209 cited
  • 1988Fourth-Generation Evaluation5,912 cited
  • 2001The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials5,372 cited
  • 1979Evaluation: A Systematic Approach2,940 cited
  • 2001The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel group randomized trials2,754 cited
  • 2018Utilization-Focused Evaluation2,308 cited
  • 1994Reducing Risks for Mental Disorders2,073 cited
  • 1990Theory-driven evaluations1,226 cited
  • 1995Reducing Risks for Mental Disorders: Frontiers for Preventive Intervention Research1,076 cited
  • 1983Designing Evaluations of Educational and Social Programs.1,042 cited
  • 1986Efficacy and effectiveness trials (and other phases of research) in the development of health promotion programs723 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

1981
Program evaluation: Methods and case studies
652 cited

Cited by

  • 2010Evidence-based practices in the field of intellectual and developmental disabilities: An international consensus approach139 cited
  • 2012Theory-driven evaluation: Conceptual framework, application and advancement97 cited
  • 2016Effectiveness of Large-Scale, State-Sponsored Language and Literacy Professional Development on Early Childhood Educator Outcomes94 cited
  • 2014Evolutionary Evaluation: Implications for evaluators, researchers, practitioners, funders and the evidence-based program mandate61 cited
  • 2012The mixing of methods: A three-step process for improving rigour in impact evaluations58 cited
  • 2017Evidence and Evidence-Based Practices: Are We There Yet?51 cited
  • 2016Interfacing theories of program with theories of evaluation for advancing evaluation practice: Reductionism, systems thinking, and pragmatic synthesis48 cited
  • 2016External Validity: The Next Step for Systematic Reviews?45 cited
  • 2021Understanding the complexity of population health interventions: assessing intervention system theory (ISyT)45 cited
  • 2011Assessing program outcomes from the bottom‐up approach: An innovative perspective to outcome evaluation44 cited
  • 2019Applying the nutrition education DESIGN procedure to the development of the In Defence of Food Curriculum10 cited
  • 2021Biologically grounded scientific methods: The challenges ahead for combating epidemics8 cited
  • 2021Suggesting a policy-driven approach to validation in the context of the Test of Proficiency in Korean (TOPIK)7 cited
  • 2020Researching Ageing3 cited
  • 2025Assessing the Time for Living and Caring (TLC) Study: Mixed-Methods Feasibility Study of a Web-Based Caregiver Intervention to Improve Respite2 cited
  • 2012Zwischen Akzeptanz und Abwehr: Das Verhältnis von Wissenschaft und Praxis am Beispiel der Begleitung und Evaluation von Programmen und Projekten1 cited