‘Who are you calling “stupid”’?

Abstract

Despite the uncritical consumption of sacred writ that tends to ‘forget ’ in the wake of its cultural ethno-typing effects, this essay ‘re-members ’ the double consciousness repressed by/in history in order to em-phasise coloniser/d alike as ‘other’. After consideration of the ethnocentric humour of Judges 3 and its possible sociological functions, I will explore the appropriation of this ideological ‘history ’ rife with stereo-types (e.g. ‘stupid’) within the colonial nexus of sixth century BCE Yehud and nineteenth century CE North American Tejas with contemporary ramifications. My analyses will demonstrate that the coloniser, immigrant by nature, uses this discourse to re-present its identity as ‘Israel ’ (and ‘indigenous’) all the while divinely legitimating its superiority through projected stereotypes and establishing its control of land claims through a national history that privileges its voice over that of the ‘other’. But coloniser/d share more than just history and space; they share an identity, ‘us ’ as essentially like ‘them ’ – ‘Israelites ’ like Mexicans, Euro-Americans like Moabites. Immigrants flood the borders in waves on what must seem to the locals like a daily basis as shifting demographics reveal. One town reports that the immigrants have dominated the population 200:10. In another area, population estimates place the ratio at 10:1. Opinions are certainly diverse on the issue. Many have expressed concern over immigrants assuming

Cite this work

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 4 citations exist upstream.