On the Relation between the Expected Value and the Volatility of the Nominal Excess Return on Stocks
Abstract
ABSTRACT We find support for a negative relation between conditional expected monthly return and conditional variance of monthly return, using a GARCH‐M model modified by allowing (1) seasonal patterns in volatility, (2) positive and negative innovations to returns having different impacts on conditional volatility, and (3) nominal interest rates to predict conditional variance. Using the modified GARCH‐M model, we also show that monthly conditional volatility may not be as persistent as was thought. Positive unanticipated returns appear to result in a downward revision of the conditional volatility whereas negative unanticipated returns result in an upward revision of conditional volatility.
Cite this
Lawrence R. Glosten, Ravi Jagannathan, David Edward Runkle (1993). On the Relation between the Expected Value and the Volatility of the Nominal Excess Return on Stocks. The Journal of Finance. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1993.tb05128.x
@article{r1993on,
title = {On the Relation between the Expected Value and the Volatility of the Nominal Excess Return on Stocks},
author = {Glosten, Lawrence R. and Jagannathan, Ravi and Runkle, David Edward},
year = {1993},
journal = {The Journal of Finance},
doi = {10.1111/j.1540-6261.1993.tb05128.x}
}Citations in this library
Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 9,041 citations exist upstream.