SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
What is the point of egalitarian social relationships?
16 references·1 citing·27 second hop
What is the point of egalitarian social relationships? (2014)What is the point of egalitarian social r…Why Relational Egalitarians Should Care About Distributions (2011)Why Relational Egalitarians S…Reasons and RecognitionEssays on the Philosophy of T.M. Scanlon (2011)Reasons and RecognitionEssays…On the Currency of Egalitarian Justice, and Other Essays in Political Philosophy (2011)On the Currency of Egalitaria…What Should Egalitarians Believe? (2008)What Should Egalitarians Beli…Global Justice, Reciprocity, and the State (2007)Global Justice, Reciprocity, …Fair Opportunity in Education: A Democratic Equality Perspective (2007)Fair Opportunity in Education…Choice, circumstance, and the value of equality (2005)Choice, circumstance, and the…What is Egalitrianism? (2003)What is Egalitrianism?The diversity of objections to inequality (2003)The diversity of objections t…4. Why Not Socialism? (2001)4. Why Not Socialism?What We Owe to Each Other (2000)What We Owe to Each OtherWhat Is the Point of Equality? (1999)What Is the Point of Equality?Fairness, Respect, and the Egalitarian Ethos (1998)Fairness, Respect, and the Eg…On the Currency of Egalitarian Justice (1989)On the Currency of Egalitaria…Equality and equal opportunity for welfare (1989)Equality and equal opportunit…The Morality of Freedom (1988)The Morality of FreedomRelational Equality and the Expressive Dimension of State Action (2018)Relational Equality and the E…The Problem of Global Justice (2005)Justice and the Priority of Politics to Morality* (2007)Republicanism and Global Justice (2010)Reconsidering Reparations (2022)A Theory of Justice (1971)Some Effects of Proportions on Group Life: Skewed Sex Ratios and Responses to Token Women (1977)Implicit social cognition: Attitudes, self-esteem, and stereotypes. (1995)Justifying the capabilities approach to justice (2010)Justice and Egalitarian Relations (2021)Conceptions of Educational Equity (2022)Preference and Urgency (1975)Justice in Ideal Theory: A Refutation (2007)Fairness, Responsibility, and Welfare (2008)A General Theory of Domination and Justice (2010)Equality of Opportunity (1998)Elements of a Theory of Human Rights (2004)Human Rights and Capabilities (2005)Toward Consolidated Democracies (1996)Distributive Justice, State Coercion, and Autonomy (2001)On the people's terms: a republican theory and model of democracy (2013)The Moral Significance of Class (2005)Wellbeing, Freedom and Social Justice (2017)A Darwinian Dilemma for Realist Theories of Value (2005)Artificial Intelligence, Values, and Alignment (2020)Levelling the Playing Field (2006)Contemporary Debates in Political Philosophy (2009)Relational Egalitarianism (2018)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2000What We Owe to Each Other3,491 cited
  • 1999What Is the Point of Equality?3,101 cited
  • 1989On the Currency of Egalitarian Justice2,963 cited
  • 1988The Morality of Freedom2,895 cited
  • 1989Equality and equal opportunity for welfare1,993 cited
  • 2003What is Egalitrianism?819 cited
  • 1998Fairness, Respect, and the Egalitarian Ethos776 cited
  • 2007Global Justice, Reciprocity, and the State635 cited
  • 2007Fair Opportunity in Education: A Democratic Equality Perspective372 cited
  • 2005Choice, circumstance, and the value of equality341 cited
  • 2008What Should Egalitarians Believe?335 cited
  • 2011On the Currency of Egalitarian Justice, and Other Essays in Political Philosophy329 cited
  • 20014. Why Not Socialism?202 cited
  • 2003The diversity of objections to inequality193 cited
  • 2011Why Relational Egalitarians Should Care About Distributions173 cited
  • 2011Reasons and RecognitionEssays on the Philosophy of T.M. Scanlon163 cited

Cited by

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

  • 2018Relational Equality and the Expressive Dimension of State Action56 cited