Traditional and alternative metrics: The full story of impact

Helena Donato

22 citations0/0 files storedRevista Portuguesa de Pneumologia

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

scientometrics and bibliometrics research Publishing and Scholarly Communication Psychology Research and Bibliometrics

Abstract

Traditional and alternative metrics: The full story of impactMétricas tradicionais e métricas alternativas: a história completa do impacto For many years, the Journal Impact Factor (JIF) was the best tool available to determine the prestige of a journal.JIF is a metric tool that was originally developed in the 1960s by the Institute for Scientific Information (ISI) as a valid metric for journal quality. 1 A group of editors from a number of scholarly journals met in December 2012 to discuss the Impact Factor, and a declaration was born ''the San Francisco Declaration on Research Assessment'' (DORA).DORA is a worldwide initiative to improve the way in which the output of scientific research is evaluated by funding agencies, academic institutions and other parties. 2 The declaration includes the following recommendations 3 :

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 22 citations exist upstream.

References

2011Can Tweets Predict Citations? Metrics of Social Impact Based on Twitter and Correlation with Traditional Metrics of Scientific Impact 2013The San Francisco Declaration on Research Assessment 2012Users, narcissism and control – tracking the impact of scholarly publications in the 21st century 2013Impact fact‐or fiction?2012Alternative metrics

Cited by

2016Altmetrics of South African Journals: Implications for Scholarly Impact of South African Research 2022How Does Open Access Publication Impact Readership and Citation Rates of Lumbar Spine Literature?2016Understanding Journal Evaluation and Strategies to Increase Impact 2018Las métricas alternativas y sus potencialidades para el profesional de la salud 2022The Worldwide Influence of Social Media on Cervical Spine Literature

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.