SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
An extension of STARD statements for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies on liver fibrosis tests: The Liver-FibroSTARD standards
5 references·1 citing·25 second hop
An extension of STARD statements for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies on liver fibrosis tests: The Liver-FibroSTARD standards (2014)An extension of STARD statements for repo…A comparison of Cohen’s Kappa and Gwet’s AC1 when calculating inter-rater reliability coefficients: a study conducted with personality disorder samples (2013)A comparison of Cohen’s Kappa…A confidence interval approach to sample size estimation for interobserver agreement studies with multiple raters and outcomes (2012)A confidence interval approac…Computing inter‐rater reliability and its variance in the presence of high agreement (2006)Computing inter‐rater reliabi…Sources of variability in histological scoring of chronic viral hepatitis† (2005)Sources of variability in his…The STARD Statement for Reporting Studies of Diagnostic Accuracy: Explanation and Elaboration (2003)The STARD Statement for Repor…Recommendations for Reporting on Rehabilitation Interventions (2020)Recommendations for Reporting…Systematic Reviews: Identifying relevant studies for systematic reviews (1994)Empirical Evidence of Design-Related Bias in Studies of Diagnostic Tests (1999)REporting recommendations for tumour MARKer prognostic studies (REMARK) (2005)A catalogue of reporting guidelines for health research (2009)Measures of Diagnostic Accuracy: Basic Definitions. (2009)The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data (1977)The Kappa Statistic in Reliability Studies: Use, Interpretation, and Sample Size Requirements (2005)Understanding interobserver agreement: the kappa statistic. (2005)Comparison of different rating scales for the use in Delphi studies: different scales lead to different consensus and show different test-retest reliability (2020)Evolution of professionals' careers upon graduation in STEM and occupational turnover over time: Patterns, diversity characteristics, career success, and self‐employment (2022)ChatGPT for assessing risk of bias of randomized trials using the RoB 2.0 tool: A methods study (2023)A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales (1960)Weighted kappa: Nominal scale agreement provision for scaled disagreement or partial credit. (1968)Measuring nominal scale agreement among many raters. (1971)Guidelines for Reporting Reliability and Agreement Studies (GRRAS) were proposed (2010)Guidelines for Reporting Reliability and Agreement Studies (GRRAS) were proposed (2011)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)Better reporting of interventions: template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) checklist and guide (2014)Current evidence from the Randomized Controlled Trials Rehabilitation Checklist (RCTRACK) reporting guideline project (2021)Reporting GUideline for Intervention DEscription in Rehabilitation (GUIDE-Rehab): a tool to open the ‘black box’ of rehabilitation complex interventions (2025)Reporting randomised trials of physical exercise or training interventions in older adults: the PETIO guideline (2025)International Journal of Behavioral Medicine (2013)Quality assessment of observational studies in a drug-safety systematic review, comparison of two tools: the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale and the RTI item bank (2014)Social networks, social capital, social support and academic success in higher education: A systematic review with a special focus on ‘underrepresented’ students (2019)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2006Computing inter‐rater reliability and its variance in the presence of high agreement2,139 cited
  • 2003The STARD Statement for Reporting Studies of Diagnostic Accuracy: Explanation and Elaboration1,124 cited
  • 2013A comparison of Cohen’s Kappa and Gwet’s AC1 when calculating inter-rater reliability coefficients: a study conducted with personality disorder samples1,021 cited
  • 2005Sources of variability in histological scoring of chronic viral hepatitis†536 cited
  • 2012A confidence interval approach to sample size estimation for interobserver agreement studies with multiple raters and outcomes139 cited

Cited by

  • 2020Recommendations for Reporting on Rehabilitation Interventions35 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work