What is wrong with gentrification?

Abstract

This essay poses the question, ‘What is wrong with gentrification?’ I explore five harms that are associated with gentrification: residential displacement; exclusion; transformation of public, social and commercial space; polarization; and homogenization. Drawing on examples from Toronto, I consider whether these outcomes are associated with gentrification and if so, whether they are harmful. I conclude that there are good reasons to worry about the displacement of current residents, but less cause to be concerned about the exclusion of nonresidents. The desire to remain in a gentrifying neighborhood is one example of ‘the problem of expensive tastes’ and luck egalitarian theory provides reasons to accommodate this preference. The transformation of public/social space, polarization, and homogenization may be harmful or beneficial, depending on the composition of the city as a whole and the power dynamics involved in the transformations.

Cite this work

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 59 citations exist upstream.

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.