SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Fallout and miss in journal peer review
3 references·0 citing·18 second hopsampled
Fallout and miss in journal peer review (2013)Fallout and miss in journal peer reviewThe manuscript reviewing process: Empirical research on review requests, review sequences, and decision rules in peer review (2009)The manuscript reviewing proc…The luck of the referee draw: the effect of exchanging reviews (2009)The luck of the referee draw:…Are three heads better than two? How the number of reviewers and editor behavior affect the rejection rate (2009)Are three heads better than t…The Manufacture of Knowledge: An Essay on the Constructivist and Contextual Nature of Science. (1982)The Manufacture of Knowledge: An Essay on the Constructivist and Contextual Nature of Science (1983)Handbook of Quantitative Science and Technology Research (2005)The predictive validity of peer review: A selective review of the judgmental forecasting qualities of peers, and implications for innovation in science (2010)Closed versus open reviewing of journal manuscripts: how far do comments differ in language use? (2011)The conceptual foundation of environmental decision support (2015)Patterns of evaluation in science: Institutionalisation, structure and functions of the referee system (1971)Scholarly Consensus and Journal Rejection Rates (1988)Publishing as Prostitution? – Choosing Between One's Own Ideas and Academic Success (2003)Rejection Rates for Journals Publishing in the Atmospheric Sciences (2010)Quantifying the Volunteer Effort of Scientific Peer Reviewing (2011)Mechanism change in a simulation of peer review: from junk support to elitism (2014)Priorities in Scientific Discovery: A Chapter in the Sociology of Science (1957)Coefficient Kappa: Some Uses, Misuses, and Alternatives (1981)Editorial peer review : its strengths and weaknesses (2001)A content analysis of referees’ comments: how do comments on manuscripts rejected by a high-impact journal and later published in either a low- or high-impact journal differ? (2009)Peer review and competition in the Art Exhibition Game (2016)Does single blind peer review hinder newcomers? (2017)
this work references cited by second hop· second hop is a sample of the most-cited connections

References

  • 2009The manuscript reviewing process: Empirical research on review requests, review sequences, and decision rules in peer review54 cited
  • 2009The luck of the referee draw: the effect of exchanging reviews51 cited
  • 2009Are three heads better than two? How the number of reviewers and editor behavior affect the rejection rate40 cited

Cited by

No citing works inside the corpus for this window.

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work