SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Equal Contributions and Credit: An Emerging Trend in the Characterization of Authorship in Major Anaesthesia Journals during a 10-Yr Period
10 references·8 citing·31 second hop
Equal Contributions and Credit: An Emerging Trend in the Characterization of Authorship in Major Anaesthesia Journals during a 10-Yr Period (2013)Equal Contributions and Credit: An Emergi…“Equal” Contributions and Credit: An Emerging Trend in the Characterization of Authorship (2010)“Equal” Contributions and Cre…Theory and practise of the g-index (2006)Theory and practise of the g-…An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output (2005)An index to quantify an indiv…When authorship fails. A proposal to make contributors accountable (1997)When authorship fails. A prop…When Authorship Fails (1997)When Authorship FailsUniform requirements for manuscripts submitted to biomedical journals. International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (1997)Uniform requirements for manu…Uniform Requirements for Manuscripts Submitted to Biomedical Journals (1997)Uniform Requirements for Manu…Authorship: time for a paradigm shift? (1997)Authorship: time for a paradi…The Contributions of Authors to Multiauthored Biomedical Research Papers (1994)The Contributions of Authors …International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. (1990)International Committee of Me…Understanding co‐corresponding authorship: A bibliometric analysis and detailed overview (2023)Understanding co‐correspondin…Multiple co-first authors, co-corresponding authors and co-supervisors: a synthesis of shared authorship credit (2021)Multiple co-first authors, co…Authorship patterns in contemporary anaesthesia literature: a cross-sectional study (2021)Authorship patterns in contem…No room for ambiguity (2020)No room for ambiguityAuthors overestimate their contribution to scientific work, demonstrating a strong bias (2020)Authors overestimate their co…Authorship: from credit to accountability (2019)Authorship: from credit to ac…The co‐first and co‐corresponding author phenomenon in the pharmacy and anesthesia journals (2016)The co‐first and co‐correspon…Equal contributions and credit: an emerging trend in the characterization of authorship in major spine journals during a 10-year period (2015)Equal contributions and credi…Requisitos uniformes para manuscritos submetidos a periódicos biomédicos: escrevendo e editando para publicações biomédicas (2006)Authorship problems in scholarly journals: considerations for authors, peer reviewers and editors (2012)Authorship policies of scientific journals: Table 1 (2015)Gender inequalities among authors who contributed equally (2019)Ethical issues in biomedical research: Perceptions and practices of postdoctoral research fellows responding to a survey (1996)The vexed question of authorship: views of researchers in a British medical faculty (1997)How the tobacco industry responded to an influential study of the health effects of secondhand smoke (2002)Authorship in a small medical journal: A study of contributorship statements by corresponding authors (2004)The Ethical Assignment of Authorship in Scientific Publications: Issues and Guidelines (2008)Little Science, Big Science (1963)Prevalence of Articles With Honorary Authors and Ghost Authors in Peer-Reviewed Medical Journals (1998)Hyperauthorship: A postmodern perversion or evidence of a structural shift in scholarly communication practices? (2001)Honorary and ghost authorship in high impact biomedical journals: a cross sectional survey (2011)The Publishing Game: Getting More for Less (1981)Scientific Collaboration Results in Higher Citation Rates of Published Articles (2006)Value of Strong Ties to Disconnected Others: Examining Knowledge Creation in Biomedicine (2008)A review of the literature on citation impact indicators (2016)Science Mapping: A Systematic Review of the Literature (2017)Software tools for conducting bibliometric analysis in science: An up-to-date review (2020)Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics (2015)The bibliometric analysis of scholarly production: How great is the impact? (2015)bibliometrix : An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis (2017)The Revised CONSORT Statement for Reporting Randomized Trials: Explanation and Elaboration (2001)Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and Elaboration (2007)CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)SPIRIT 2013 explanation and elaboration: guidance for protocols of clinical trials (2013)CONSORT 2010 statement: extension to randomised pilot and feasibility trials (2016)Why do Some Countries Publish More Than Others? An International Comparison of Research Funding, English Proficiency and Publication Output in Highly Ranked General Medical Journals (2004)A Systematic Review of Research on the Meaning, Ethics and Practices of Authorship across Scholarly Disciplines (2011)How can we ensure visibility and diversity in research contributions? How the Contributor Role Taxonomy (CRediT) is helping the shift from authorship to contributorship (2019)CONSORT 2010 explanation and elaboration: Updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2011)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2005An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output11,612 cited
  • 2006Theory and practise of the g-index2,347 cited
  • 1997When authorship fails. A proposal to make contributors accountable566 cited
  • 1990International Committee of Medical Journal Editors.415 cited
  • 1997When Authorship Fails401 cited
  • 1997Uniform requirements for manuscripts submitted to biomedical journals. International Committee of Medical Journal Editors358 cited
  • 1994The Contributions of Authors to Multiauthored Biomedical Research Papers293 cited
  • 1997Uniform Requirements for Manuscripts Submitted to Biomedical Journals247 cited
  • 1997Authorship: time for a paradigm shift?113 cited
  • 2010“Equal” Contributions and Credit: An Emerging Trend in the Characterization of Authorship109 cited

Cited by

  • 2020Authors overestimate their contribution to scientific work, demonstrating a strong bias33 cited
  • 2021Multiple co-first authors, co-corresponding authors and co-supervisors: a synthesis of shared authorship credit30 cited
  • 2020No room for ambiguity24 cited
  • 2015Equal contributions and credit: an emerging trend in the characterization of authorship in major spine journals during a 10-year period21 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

  • 2023Understanding co‐corresponding authorship: A bibliometric analysis and detailed overview17 cited
  • 2019Authorship: from credit to accountability13 cited
  • 2016The co‐first and co‐corresponding author phenomenon in the pharmacy and anesthesia journals11 cited
  • 2021Authorship patterns in contemporary anaesthesia literature: a cross-sectional study8 cited