The Goldstein-Scheerer Cube test: A developmental-regressive study

Abstract

The Goldstein-Scheerer Cube Test was analyzed within a developmental frame of reference because Goldstein and Scheerer's criteria of pathological thought processes were found to be parallel to stages of development in concept formation. In addition to accuracy of the reproduction, the shape of the design frame and any rotations also were studied. Hypotheses were that the younger the subjects, the more global and diffuse their reproduction, while with increasing age the designs would be more accurate. A developmental gradient was suggested on a priori theoretical considerations. Thus, a gradient that consisted of three stages of perceptual matching, superceded by five stages of abstract analysis of the design, was envisaged. With regard to the frame and position of the reproduction, the breaking up of the square frame was considered most regressive. Among the rotations, those of 90%-180% were seen as more regressive than those of 45%; distinctions were made according to the causes of the rotations. The test was administered to samples of children aged 5, 7, 9, and 11 years, respectively (N = 171). The hypotheses generally were supported. The stages of the gradient of the configuration of the pattern showed very high scalability. The ranking among the shape of the frame of the copies and the various rotations of the copies relative to the design were supported. The 5-year-olds were significantly different from the three older age groups, as predicted. The results indicate a regressive hierarchy among faulty reactions to the Cube Test.

Cite this work

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 1 citations exist upstream.

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.