The Development of New Paradigm Values, Thinkers, and Business

Robert A. Giacalone · Dafna Eylon

25 citations0/0 files storedAmerican Behavioral Scientist

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Management and Organizational Studies Management Theory and Practice Organizational Management and Change

Abstract

The term “new paradigm” is becoming increasingly popular in business. However, there is little agreement as to what this construct means. In this article, the authors present key factors influential in the development of this paradigm. They then turn to categorizing the different supporters along two continua. This classification is used to offer suggestions as to how the new paradigm might be enacted and to briefly explore why new paradigm thought should be considered by business.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 25 citations exist upstream.

References

1964The Structure of Scientific Revolutions.1993Reengineering the corporation: A manifesto for business revolution 1990The Fifth Discipline 2017The Structure of Scientific Revolutions 1971Man's search for meaning; an introduction to logotherapy 1986General System Theory 1999Convergent Stakeholder Theory 1990The deming management method

Cited by

2016Workplace spirituality and employee work intentions : examining the relationship and the mediating role of ethical leadership.

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.