No open-access location is known for this record yet.
No open-access location is known for this record yet.
Data has been gathered on the perception of risk associated with blood donation and transfusion (including the use of so-called blood substitutes) by UK general practitioners (GPs), anaesthetists, healthcare journalists and blood donors of both genders. A questionnaire survey was conducted from March-July 2000 involving (i) GPs (n = 88), (ii) anaesthetists (n = 143), (iii)journalists (n = 20), and (iv) blood donors (n = 250). Respondents rated (scale of 1-7) the general risk of blood transfusion and the risk of infection associated with blood transfusion and donation. Respondents were asked through free response questions to identify the risks they most associated with blood transfusion and the infections associated with blood transfusion and donation. They were also asked to indicate their preference for their own blood, compared to donor blood or a blood substitute and to make a choice between donated blood or a blood substitute. The percentage of respondents who preferred to receive their own blood, compared to donor blood or a suitable substitute, was 73-94%. When required to choose between donor blood or a blood substitute, there were significant (P < 0.05) differences between sample groups: anaesthetists and GPs preferred to receive a blood substitute (52-59%), whereas blood donors and journalists preferred donated blood (74-93%). These findings have clear implications for the future development and implementation of modern transfusion options, including the use and acceptability of blood substitutes as alternatives to donor blood.
Loading…
Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 28 citations exist upstream.
Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.
Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.