Is skills training necessary for the primary prevention of marital distress and dissolution? A 3-year experimental study of three interventions.

Ronald David Rogge · Rebecca J. Cobb · Erika E. Lawrence · Matthew D. Johnson · Thomas N. Bradbury

134 citations0/0 files storedJournal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Attachment and Relationship Dynamics Family Dynamics and Relationships Counseling, Therapy, and Family Dynamics

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Evidence in support of skill-based programs for preventing marital discord and dissolution, while promising, comes mainly from studies using single treatment conditions, passive assessment-only control conditions, and short-term follow-up assessments of relationship outcomes. This study overcomes these limitations and further evaluates the efficacy of skill-based programs. METHOD: Engaged and newlywed couples (N = 174) were randomly assigned to a 4-session, 15-hr small-group intervention designed to teach them skills in managing conflict and problem resolution (PREP) or skills in acceptance, support, and empathy (CARE). These couples were compared to each other, to couples receiving a 1-session relationship awareness (RA) intervention with no skill training, and to couples receiving no treatment on 3-year rates of dissolution and 3-year trajectories of self-reported relationship functioning. RESULTS: Couples in the no-treatment condition dissolved their relationships at a higher rate (24%) than couples completing PREP, CARE, and RA, who did not differ on rates of dissolution (11%). PREP and CARE yielded unintended effects on 3-year changes in reported relationship behaviors. For example, wives receiving PREP showed slower declines in hostile conflict than wives receiving CARE, and husbands and wives receiving CARE showed faster declines in positive behaviors than husbands and wives receiving PREP. CONCLUSIONS: These findings highlight the potential value of cost-effective interventions such as RA, cast doubt on the unique benefits of skill-based interventions for primary prevention of relationship dysfunction, and raise the possibility that skill-based interventions may inadvertently sensitize couples to skill deficits in their relationships.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 134 citations exist upstream.

References

1996The Revised Conflict Tactics Scales (CTS2)1959Short Marital-Adjustment and Prediction Tests: Their Reliability and Validity 1997Interpersonal forgiving in close relationships.2005Dyadic Coping and Its Significance for Marital Functioning.1997Neuroticism, marital interaction, and the trajectory of marital satisfaction.2008Does marriage and relationship education work? A meta-analytic study.1986Marital Therapy Strategies Based On Social Learning & Behavior Exchange Principles 1993Preventing marital distress through communication and conflict management training: A 4- and 5-year follow-up.

Cited by

2015Effects of relationship education on couple communication and satisfaction: A randomized controlled trial with low-income couples.2016Positive and negative evaluation of relationships: Development and validation of the Positive–Negative Relationship Quality (PN-RQ) scale.2020Examining the correlates of psychological flexibility in romantic relationship and family dynamics: A meta-analysis 2019Best Practices in Relationship Education Focused on Intimate Relationships

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.