Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Studying the potential impact of automated document classification on scheduling a systematic review update

7 references·16 citing·47 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

2008Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.0.1. The Cochrane Collaboration5,525 cited
2007How Quickly Do Systematic Reviews Go Out of Date? A Survival Analysis837 cited
2008When and how to update systematic reviews151 cited
2006Of studies, syntheses, synopses, summaries, and systems: the "5S" evolution of information services for evidence-based healthcare decisions151 cited
2010A new algorithm for reducing the workload of experts in performing systematic reviews100 cited
2007A systematic review identified few methods and strategies describing when and how to update systematic reviews98 cited
2008Surveillance search techniques identified the need to update systematic reviews84 cited

Cited by

2017Reproducibility of studies on text mining for citation screening in systematic reviews: Evaluation and checklist54 cited
2020Refining Boolean queries to identify relevant studies for systematic review updates47 cited
2016A critical analysis of studies that address the use of text mining for citation screening in systematic reviews41 cited
2023Automating Systematic Literature Reviews with Natural Language Processing and Text Mining: A Systematic Literature Review33 cited
2019Measuring the impact of screening automation on meta-analyses of diagnostic test accuracy33 cited
2013A large-scale analysis of the reasons given for excluding articles that are retrieved by literature search during systematic review.

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

32 cited

2019Methodological and reporting quality in non-Cochrane systematic review updates could be improved: a comparative study30 cited

2014Dual computer monitors to increase efficiency of conducting systematic reviews24 cited

2017Unreported links between trial registrations and published articles were identified using document similarity measures in a cross-sectional analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov22 cited

2018Machine learning algorithms for systematic review: reducing workload in a preclinical review of animal studies and reducing human screening error19 cited

2019The risk of conclusion change in systematic review updates can be estimated by learning from a database of published examples15 cited

2014Increased Workload for Systematic Review Literature Searches of Diagnostic Tests Compared With Treatments: Challenges and Opportunities12 cited

2016Systematic review protocol assessing the processes for linking clinical trial registries and their published results10 cited

2024A living critical interpretive synthesis to yield a framework on the production and dissemination of living evidence syntheses for decision-making9 cited

2020Updating systematic reviews can improve the precision of outcomes: a comparative study9 cited

2022Increasing comprehensiveness and reducing workload in a systematic review of complex interventions using automated machine learning9 cited