The Objectives of Student Discipline and The Process That's Due: Are They Compatible?

Donald D. Gehring

26 citations0/0 files storedNASPA Journal

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Legal Issues in Education Higher Education Practises and Engagement Education Discipline and Inequality

Abstract

The disciplinary process on campuses has been too procedural and mirrors an adversarial proceeding that precludes student development. Suggestions for a paireddown process allowing for student learning are provided.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 26 citations exist upstream.

References

1978The Law of Higher Education 1963The World book dictionary

Cited by

2005A Theoretical Model to Explain the Overrepresentation of College Men among Campus Judicial Offenders: Implications for Campus Administrators 2004Arrested emotional development: Connecting college men, emotions, and misconduct 2017The Model of Transformational Change for Moral Action: A Conceptual Framework to Elevate Student Conduct Practice in Higher Education 2022Gender Equity and Due Process in Campus Sexual Assault Adjudication Procedures

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.