SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Scientific evaluation of modern clinical research: we need a new currency!
4 references·0 citing·16 second hop
Scientific evaluation of modern clinical research: we need a new currency! (2011)Scientific evaluation of modern clinical …Surgical evaluation and knowledge transfer—methods of clinical research in surgery (2011)Surgical evaluation and knowl…The impact factor ranking—a challenge for scientists and publishers (2010)The impact factor ranking—a c…Challenges in evaluating surgical innovation (2009)Challenges in evaluating surg…Can decision making in general surgery be based on evidence? An empirical study of Cochrane Reviews (2009)Can decision making in genera…Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology A Proposal for Reporting (2000)Extending the CONSORT Statement to Randomized Trials of Nonpharmacologic Treatment: Explanation and Elaboration (2008)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)Human Capital and Productivity in Surgery Research Across the Globe: A Big Data Analysis Using Artificial Intelligence (2024)Systematic Reviews: Synthesis of Best Evidence for Clinical Decisions (1997)Assessing the quality of controlled clinical trials (2001)The Cochrane Library (2005)Improving the reporting of pragmatic trials: an extension of the CONSORT statement (2008)IDEAL framework for surgical innovation 1: the idea and development stages (2013)No Surgical Innovation Without Evaluation (2018)The IDEAL Reporting Guidelines (2020)Citation Analysis as a Tool in Journal Evaluation (1972)Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research (1997)An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output (2005)Two-year citations of JAPPL original articles: evidence of a relative age effect (2012)Does the multi-authorship trend influence the quality of an article? (2013)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2009Challenges in evaluating surgical innovation654 cited
  • 2011Surgical evaluation and knowledge transfer—methods of clinical research in surgery27 cited
  • 2010The impact factor ranking—a challenge for scientists and publishers24 cited
  • 2009Can decision making in general surgery be based on evidence? An empirical study of Cochrane Reviews21 cited

Cited by

No citing works inside the corpus for this window.

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work