First Comprehensive Survey of NSF Applicants Focuses on Their Concerns About Proposal Review

Unknown author

37 citations0/0 files storedScience Technology & Human Values

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Research, Science, and Academia scientometrics and bibliometrics research Psychology Research and Bibliometrics

Abstract

Earlier this year the National Science Foundation (NSF) published my report1 of a survey of all principal investigators who received decisions about their research proposals from NSF during 1985. This article describes the origins and aims of the survey, how it was conducted, and some of the implications of our findings for the Foundation's proposal review and decisionmaking process-and for better communication among proposers, reviewers, and Foundation staff.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 37 citations exist upstream.

Cited by

1991The Predictive Ability of Peer Review of Grant Proposals: The Case of Ecology and the US National Science Foundation 2000Higher Form of nonsense 2015Defining the role of cognitive distance in the peer review process with an explorative study of a grant scheme in infection biology 2024The costs of competition in distributing scarce research funds 1993Peer Review and Evaluation of R&D Impacts 2017Preserving the Quality of Scientific Research: Peer Review of Research Articles 2000The Bias of Sighted Reviewers in Research Proposal Evaluation: A Comparative Analysis of Blind and Open Review in Korea 1994The role and influence of the us national science foundation's program officers in reviewing and awarding grants

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.