Article1989

On the relevance of philosophy to psychological research: Fashions versus fundamentals

2 citations0/0 files storedAustralian Journal of Psychology

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology Philosophy and Theoretical Science Philosophy and Phenomenology Studies

Abstract

L'auteur reprend les arguments fournis par Slezak (1989) qui critique sa position sur la question de la pertinence de la philosophie pour la psychologie. Contestant la lecture qu'a fait Slezak de son article, l'auteur montre que l'on doit distinguer clairement les elements suivants: 1) recherche psychologique vs psychologie, 2) tester des theories vs faire des metaphores, et, 3) les differentes conceptions de la philosophie

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 2 citations exist upstream.

References

1975The Language of Thought 1986Australian Realism: The Systematic Philosophy of John Anderson 1988On the relevance of philosophy for psychological research: A preliminary analysis of some influences of andersonian realism

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.