Beyond moulin mechanisms

Abstract

The only known general technique for designing truthful, approximatelybudget-balanced cost-sharing mechanisms is due to Moulin. While Moulin mechanisms have been successfully designed for a widerange of applications, recent negative results show that for manyfundamental cost-sharing problems, Moulin mechanisms inevitably sufferfrom poor budget-balance, poor economic efficiency, or both. We propose acyclic mechanisms, a new framework for designingtruthful, approximately budget-balanced cost-sharing mechanisms. Acyclic mechanisms strictly generalize Moulin mechanisms andoffer three important advantages. First, it is easier to design acyclic mechanisms than Moulinmechanisms: many classical primal-dual algorithms naturallyinduce a non-Moulin acyclic mechanism with good performanceguarantees. Second, for several important classes of cost-sharing problems, acyclicmechanisms have exponentially better budget-balance and economicefficiency than Moulin mechanisms.Finally, while Moulin mechanisms have found application primarily in binary demand games, we extend acyclic mechanisms to general demand games, a multi-parameter setting in which each bidder can be allocated one of several levels of service.

Cite this work

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 38 citations exist upstream.

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.