SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Poor reporting of search strategy and conflict of interest in over 250 narrative and systematic reviews of two biologic agents in arthritis: A systematic review
16 references·10 citing·34 second hop
Poor reporting of search strategy and conflict of interest in over 250 narrative and systematic reviews of two biologic agents in arthritis: A systematic review (2008)Poor reporting of search strategy and con…Commenting on Writing (2006)Commenting on WritingSystematic Reviews in Health Care. Meta-analysis in Context. (2002)Systematic Reviews in Health …Quality of Reporting of Randomized Trials as a Measure of Methodologic Quality (2002)Quality of Reporting of Rando…Measuring the Quality of Editorial Peer Review (2002)Measuring the Quality of Edit…Effects of Editorial Peer Review (2002)Effects of Editorial Peer Rev…Systematic Reviews in Health Care : Meta-Analysis in Context (2000)Systematic Reviews in Health …Peer Review in Health Sciences (1999)Peer Review in Health SciencesMeta-Analysis, Decision Analysis, and Cost-Effectiveness Analysis (1999)Meta-Analysis, Decision Analy…Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement (1999)Improving the quality of repo…Methodology and Reports of Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (1998)Methodology and Reports of Sy…Does quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses? (1998)Does quality of reports of ra…Systematic Reviews: Synthesis of Best Evidence for Clinical Decisions (1997)Systematic Reviews: Synthesis…Selecting and Appraising Studies for a Systematic Review (1997)Selecting and Appraising Stud…Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement (1996)Improving the quality of repo…Methodologic guidelines for systematic reviews of randomized control trials in health care from the potsdam consultation on meta-analysis (1995)Methodologic guidelines for s…Manuscript Quality before and after Peer Review and Editing at Annals of Internal Medicine (1994)Manuscript Quality before and…Searching for and selecting studies (2023)Searching for and selecting s…An assessment of the quality of the search strategy: a case of bibliometric studies published in business and economics (2023)An assessment of the quality …Adherence to literature search reporting guidelines in leading rheumatology journals’ systematic reviews: umbrella review protocol (2022)Adherence to literature searc…Quality of Literature Searches Published in Leading Neurosurgical Journals: A Review of Reviews (2020)Quality of Literature Searche…A review of the reporting of web searching to identify studies for C ochrane systematic reviews (2017)A review of the reporting of …Narrative Reviews (2014)Narrative ReviewsSome improvements are apparent in identifying adverse effects in systematic reviews from 1994 to 2011 (2013)Some improvements are apparen…Methods for documenting systematic review searches: a discussion of common issues (2013)Methods for documenting syste…Systematic reviews on tobacco control from Cochrane and the Community Guide: different methods, similar findings (2010)Systematic reviews on tobacco…Reporting and presenting information retrieval processes: the need for optimizing common practice in health technology assessment (2010)Reporting and presenting info…Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials (1995)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)Bad reporting does not mean bad methods for randomised trials: observational study of randomised controlled trials performed by the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (2004)The Number, Quality, and Coverage of Randomized Controlled Trials in Nephrology (2004)The effects of excluding patients from the analysis in randomised controlled trials: meta-epidemiological study (2009)Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test (1997)What contributions do languages other than English make on the results of meta-analyses? (2000)The inclusion of reports of randomised trials published in languages other than English in systematic reviews (2003)Religion/spirituality and adolescent health outcomes: a review (2006)Empirical Evidence of Bias (1995)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data (1977)Evaluating non-randomised intervention studies (2003)Systematic Reviews: Identifying relevant studies for systematic reviews (1994)Core outcome domains for chronic pain clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendations (2003)Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and Elaboration (2007)Predicting relapse: A meta-analysis of sexual offender recidivism studies. (1998)Using meta ethnography to synthesise qualitative research: a worked example (2002)Reporting standards for research in psychology: Why do we need them? What might they be? (2008)Assessing the quality of controlled clinical trials (2001)Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews (2008)Systematic reviews: CRD's guidance for undertaking reviews in health care (2010)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel group randomized trials (2001)Systematic Review and Meta-analysis (2008)Synthesizing information systems knowledge: A typology of literature reviews (2014)El Cuestionario de Salud SF-36 español: una década de experiencia y nuevos desarrollos (2005)Much ado about nothing: a comparison of the performance of meta‐analytical methods with rare events (2006)Time to challenge the spurious hierarchy of systematic over narrative reviews? (2018)Is Sleep Duration Associated With Childhood Obesity? A Systematic Review and Meta‐analysis (2008)Interpreting Indirect Treatment Comparisons and Network Meta-Analysis for Health-Care Decision Making: Report of the ISPOR Task Force on Indirect Treatment Comparisons Good Research Practices: Part 1 (2011)Intimate partner violence against adult women and its association with major depressive disorder, depressive symptoms and postpartum depression: A systematic review and meta-analysis (2012)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1999Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement4,828 cited
  • 1998Does quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses?3,560 cited
  • 1996Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement3,337 cited
  • 2000Systematic Reviews in Health Care : Meta-Analysis in Context2,307 cited
  • 1997Systematic Reviews: Synthesis of Best Evidence for Clinical Decisions2,184 cited
  • 2002Systematic Reviews in Health Care. Meta-analysis in Context.1,363 cited
  • 1999Meta-Analysis, Decision Analysis, and Cost-Effectiveness Analysis925 cited
  • 1995Methodologic guidelines for systematic reviews of randomized control trials in health care from the potsdam consultation on meta-analysis574 cited
  • 1998Methodology and Reports of Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses534 cited
  • 2002Quality of Reporting of Randomized Trials as a Measure of Methodologic Quality397 cited
  • 2002Effects of Editorial Peer Review347 cited
  • 1994Manuscript Quality before and after Peer Review and Editing at Annals of Internal Medicine324 cited
  • 1997Selecting and Appraising Studies for a Systematic Review283 cited
  • 1999Peer Review in Health Sciences268 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

  • 2006Commenting on Writing235 cited
  • 2002Measuring the Quality of Editorial Peer Review230 cited
  • Cited by

    • 2013Methods for documenting systematic review searches: a discussion of common issues37 cited
    • 2013Some improvements are apparent in identifying adverse effects in systematic reviews from 1994 to 201134 cited
    • 2014Narrative Reviews30 cited
    • 2010Reporting and presenting information retrieval processes: the need for optimizing common practice in health technology assessment30 cited
    • 2023Searching for and selecting studies29 cited
    • 2017A review of the reporting of web searching to identify studies for C ochrane systematic reviews27 cited
    • 2022Adherence to literature search reporting guidelines in leading rheumatology journals’ systematic reviews: umbrella review protocol23 cited
    • 2023An assessment of the quality of the search strategy: a case of bibliometric studies published in business and economics19 cited
    • 2010Systematic reviews on tobacco control from Cochrane and the Community Guide: different methods, similar findings13 cited
    • 2020Quality of Literature Searches Published in Leading Neurosurgical Journals: A Review of Reviews13 cited