Does Memory Test Performance in Children Become More Consistent with Age? Cross-Sectional Comparisons Using the WRAML

John David Putzke · Wayne V. Adams · Thomas J. Boll

4 citations0/0 files storedJournal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Psychological Testing and Assessment Cognitive Abilities and Testing Developmental and Educational Neuropsychology

Abstract

This study examined intertask consistency on the Wide Range Assessment of Memory and Learning (WRAML), using two age cohorts of children. Eighty-one neurologically impaired children and 76 matched (i.e., age, gender, race) controls were separated into two age groups, 5- to 9- and 10- to 14-year-olds. Performance on four subtests from the WRAML Memory Screening Index were examined. For the older neurologic sample, all six intertask correlations were significant (mean r = .58) while only three of the six correlation coefficients were significant among the younger neurologic group (mean r = .26). In contrast, only three of the six intertask coefficients were statistically significant in both the younger and older controls. A possible explanation for these divergent findings and clinical implications of intertask variability on memory measures are discussed.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.