SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Data at the grammar-pragmatics interface: the case of resumptive pronouns in English · Study

ArticleShelves

ArticleData at the grammar-pragmatics interface: the case of resumptive pronouns in English

Ronnie Cann2004

Article2004

Data at the grammar-pragmatics interface: the case of resumptive pronouns in English

Ronnie Cann · Tami Kaplan · Ruth Kempson

63 citations·0/0 files stored·Lingua

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation Language Development and Disorders Linguistic Studies and Language Acquisition

Abstract

No abstract was published for this record.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 63 citations exist upstream.

References

1993Lectures on Government and Binding 2014The Minimalist Program 1983The Modularity of Mind 1986Relevance: Communication and Cognition 1984Lectures on government and binding . By Noam Chomsky. (Studies in generative grammar, 9.) Dordrecht, Holland, & Cinnaminson, NJ: Foris, 1981. Pp. 371. Cloth f 90.00, paper f 50.00. - Some concepts and consequences of the theory of government and binding . By Noam Chomsky. (Linguistic Inquiry monographs, 6.) Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1982. Pp. 110. Cloth $20.00, paper $7.95.1967Constraints on variables in syntax 1986Some Concepts and Consequences of the Theory of Government and Binding 1993From Discourse to Logic

Cited by

2019Relative Clauses 2008Grammaticality as evidence and as prediction in a Galilean linguistics 2021Gradient Acceptability and Linguistic Theory 2013Resumption in English 2011Resumption and gaps in English relative clauses: Relative acceptability creates an illusion of ‘saving’

Related works

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

2002Headed relative clauses in generative syntax - Part IIarticle · 14 shared references 2019Relative Clausesbook · 12 shared references 2016Analysing English Sentencesbook · 10 shared references 2014Resumptive Pronouns and Competitionarticle · 9 shared references 2015A uniform syntax for phrasal movement : a case study of Dinka Borthesis · 9 shared references 1996Derivation, representation, and resumption: the domain of weak crossoverarticle · 9 shared references

Details

Year2004

Typearticle

Published2004-09-24

VenueLingua

ISSN-L0024-3841

Languageen

Citations63

Files0 public / 0

ShelfSyntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation

Identifiers

doi10.1016/j.lingua.2004.07.004

openalex_workW2071482837

Links

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.

2009

Truly intrusive: Resumptive pronominals in questions and relative clauses

2019Relative Clauses: Structure and Variation in Everyday English

2014Restrictive Relatives in L3 English: L1 Transfer and Ultimate Attainment Convergence