Decency, dependence and the lash: Gender and the British debate over slave emancipation, 1830–34

Diana Paton

75 citations0/0 files storedSlavery and Abolition

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Colonialism, slavery, and trade Historical Gender and Feminism Studies Political Theory and Influence

Abstract

(1996). Decency, dependence and the lash: Gender and the British debate over slave emancipation, 1830–34. Slavery & Abolition: Vol. 17, No. 3, pp. 163-184.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 75 citations exist upstream.

References

1988The Sexual Contract 1983Slavery and Social Death. A Comparative Study 1992Habermas and the public sphere 1987Family Fortunes: Men and Women of the English Middle Class 1780-1850 1944Capitalism And Slavery 1995Burdens of history: British feminists, Indian women, and imperial culture, 1865-1915 1972The Development of Creole Society in Jamaica.1945Capitalism and Slavery

Cited by

2005Gender and Slave Emancipation in the Atlantic World 2005Representations of Slave Women in Discourses on Slavery and Abolition, 1780–1838 2012Historiography and Research Problems of Slavery and the Slave Trade in a Global-Historical Perspective 2011NEW PERSPECTIVES ON SLAVERY AND EMANCIPATION IN THE BRITISH CARIBBEAN

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.