SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Comments on “Getting scarred and winning lotteries: Effects of exemplar cuing and statistical format on imagining low‐probability events,” By Newell, Mitchell, and Hayes (2008)
4 references·2 citing·20 second hop
Comments on “Getting scarred and winning lotteries: Effects of exemplar cuing and statistical format on imagining low‐probability events,” By Newell, Mitchell, and Hayes (2008) (2009)Comments on “Getting scarred and winning …Getting scarred and winning lotteries: effects of exemplar cuing and statistical format on imagining low‐probability events (2007)Getting scarred and winning l…Thinking About Low-Probability Events (2004)Thinking About Low-Probabilit…When are people persuaded by DNA match statistics? (2001)When are people persuaded by …The Psychology of Numbers in the Courtroom: How to Make DNA-Match Statistics Seem Impressive or Insufficient (2001)The Psychology of Numbers in …Rejoinder: Missing the Target: A Reply to Koehler & Macchi (2009) (2009)Rejoinder: Missing the Target…Missing the target: A reply to Koehler & Macchi (2009) (2009)Missing the target: A reply t…Availability: A heuristic for judging frequency and probability (1973)Norm theory: Comparing reality to its alternatives. (1986)How to improve Bayesian reasoning without instruction: Frequency formats. (1995)The risk of surprise in energy technology costs (2007)If the Shoe Fits They Might Acquit: The Value of Forensic Science Testimony (2011)Do Jurors Give Appropriate Weight to Forensic Identification Evidence? (2013)Violence risk assessment and risk communication: The effects of using actual cases, providing instruction, and employing probability versus frequency formats. (2000)Risk as feelings. (2001)A perspective on judgment and choice: Mapping bounded rationality. (2003)From group diffusion to ratio bias: Effects of denominator and numerator salience on intuitive risk and likelihood judgments (2009)Testing temporal frames of colorectal cancer risks: evidence from randomized online experiments (2022)The effect of the 1‐in‐X numerical format on choices (2023)Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases (1975)Extensional versus intuitive reasoning: The conjunction fallacy in probability judgment. (1983)Handbook of psychology in legal contexts (2003)Is Probabilistic Evidence a Source of Knowledge? (2014)Lay understanding of forensic statistics: Evaluation of random match probabilities, likelihood ratios, and verbal equivalents. (2015)Operational benefits and challenges of the use of fingerprint statistical models: A field study (2011)‘The Innocent v The Fickle Few’: How Jurors Understand Random-Match-Probabilities and Judges’ Directions when Reasoning about DNA and Refuting Evidence (2017)Generalizations and Reference Classes (2020)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2001When are people persuaded by DNA match statistics?100 cited
  • 2004Thinking About Low-Probability Events67 cited
  • 2001The Psychology of Numbers in the Courtroom: How to Make DNA-Match Statistics Seem Impressive or Insufficient25 cited
  • 2007Getting scarred and winning lotteries: effects of exemplar cuing and statistical format on imagining low‐probability events15 cited

Cited by

  • 2009Missing the target: A reply to Koehler & Macchi (2009)1 cited
  • 2009Rejoinder: Missing the Target: A Reply to Koehler & Macchi (2009)0 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work