Rethinking Transcendence: The Role of Language in Zen Experience

Abstract

The object of this essay is to present an alternative to what I take to be a fundamental component of Western-language interpretations of experience-the idea that is an undistorted, pure of things as they beyond the shaping power of language. This alternative will consist in an interpretation of practice and that acknowledges numerous ways in which language and linguistically articulated social practice have shaped and made possible distinctively Zen modes of experience. The essay's critical focus will be restricted to the normative status of our (Westernlanguage) claim that experience transcends language, a position either developed or assumed, so far as I can see, in all English language works on that attempt to articulate what enlightenment is. The essay is not, therefore, grounded in a text-based descriptive claim about what East Asians have thought or said about the relation between language and experience. Instead it asserts that regardless of how East Asians have understood the role of language in experience, we are no longer justified in thinking that this kind of religious experience (or any other) stands altogether beyond the shaping power of language and culture.

Cite this work

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 68 citations exist upstream.