SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Ética e integridade na ciência: da responsabilidade do cientista à responsabilidade coletiva
5 references·1 citing·24 second hop
Ética e integridade na ciência: da responsabilidade do cientista à responsabilidade coletiva (2014)Ética e integridade na ciência: da respon…Tie funding to research integrity (2010)Tie funding to research integ…Peers nip misconduct in the bud (2010)Peers nip misconduct in the b…Battling the Paper Glut (2010)Battling the Paper GlutScientists behaving badly (2005)Scientists behaving badlyFraud and the Structure of Science (1981)Fraud and the Structure of Sc…Integridade científica e pesquisa em saúde no Brasil: revisão da literatura (2015)Integridade científica e pesq…Ethical Problems in Academic Research (1993)Academic Dishonesty: An Educator's Guide (2001)Authorship Issues and Conflict in the U.S. Academic Chemical Community (2015)Research Misconduct: The Peril of Publish or Perish (2016)Plagiarism in articles published in journals indexed in the Scientific Periodicals Electronic Library (SPELL): a comparative analysis between 2013 and 2018 (2021)Cheating among college and university students: A North American perspective (2005)Repairing research integrity (2008)How Many Scientists Fabricate and Falsify Research? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Survey Data (2009)Exorcising ghostwriting… (2011)Education and training policies for research integrity: Insights from a focus group study (2021)Important Topics for Fostering Research Integrity by Research Performing and Research Funding Organizations: A Delphi Consensus Study (2021)Ethical dilemmas in scientific publication: pitfalls and solutions for editors (2006)Academia's obsession with quantity (2012)Integridade científica na educação de profissionais de saúde (2019)Publish or Perish: A Proposal (1986)Is it becoming harder to secure reviewers for peer review? A test with data from five ecology journals (2016)Bypass and hyperbole in soil research: A personal view on plausible causes and possible remedies (2020)Objectivity of the peer‐review process: Enduring myth, reality, and possible remedies (2021)Magic: A Theoretical Reassessment [and Comments and Replies] (1982)Explaining Creativity: The Attributional Perspective (1995)Exploring Scientific Misconduct: Isolated Individuals, Impure Institutions, or an Inevitable Idiom of Modern Science? (2008)Do Pressures to Publish Increase Scientists' Bias? An Empirical Support from US States Data (2010)Misconduct accounts for the majority of retracted scientific publications (2012)Inferential Statistics as Descriptive Statistics: There Is No Replication Crisis if We Don’t Expect Replication (2019)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2005Scientists behaving badly1,089 cited
  • 1981Fraud and the Structure of Science119 cited
  • 2010Peers nip misconduct in the bud52 cited
  • 2010Battling the Paper Glut47 cited
  • 2010Tie funding to research integrity41 cited

Cited by

  • 2015Integridade científica e pesquisa em saúde no Brasil: revisão da literatura12 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work