SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Randomized controlled trials in pediatric critical care: a scoping review
8 references·5 citing·45 second hop
Randomized controlled trials in pediatric critical care: a scoping review (2013)Randomized controlled trials in pediatric…Risk of bias versus quality assessment of randomised controlled trials: cross sectional study (2009)Risk of bias versus quality a…Searching for Studies (2008)Searching for StudiesAssessing Risk of Bias in Included Studies (2008)Assessing Risk of Bias in Inc…Developing optimal search strategies for detecting clinically sound treatment studies in EMBASE. (2006)Developing optimal search str…An absence of pediatric randomized controlled trials in general medical journals, 1985–2004 (2006)An absence of pediatric rando…Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework (2005)Scoping studies: towards a me…Tips for learners of evidence-based medicine: 3. Measures of observer variability (kappa statistic) (2004)Tips for learners of evidence…Users' Guides to the Medical Literature (1999)Users' Guides to the Medical …A multivariate model for successful publication of intensive care medicine randomized controlled trials in the highest impact factor journals: the SCOTI score (2021)A multivariate model for succ…Identification and Evaluation of Controlled Trials in Pediatric Cardiology: Crowdsourced Scoping Review and Creation of Accessible Searchable Database (2020)Identification and Evaluation…Research Collaboration in Pediatric Critical Care Randomized Controlled Trials: A Social Network Analysis of Coauthorship* (2019)Research Collaboration in Ped…Randomized controlled trials in children’s heart surgery in the 21st century: a systematic review (2017)Randomized controlled trials …A meta‐epidemiological study to examine the association between bias and treatment effects in neonatal trials (2014)A meta‐epidemiological study …The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)Chapter 8: Assessing risk of bias in included studies (2008)Empirical evidence of bias in treatment effect estimates in controlled trials with different interventions and outcomes: meta-epidemiological study (2008)Assessment of study quality for systematic reviews: a comparison of the Cochrane Collaboration Risk of Bias Tool and the Effective Public Health Practice Project Quality Assessment Tool: methodological research (2010)GRADE guidelines: 8. Rating the quality of evidence—indirectness (2011)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.0.1. The Cochrane Collaboration (2008)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)CONSORT 2010 Statement: Updated Guidelines for Reporting Parallel Group Randomized Trials (2010)Randomized clinical trials in dentistry: Risks of bias, risks of random errors, reporting quality, and methodologic quality over the years 1955–2013 (2017)Association Between Lack of Blinding and Mortality Results in Critical Care Randomized Controlled Trials: A Meta-Epidemiological Study* (2021)The impact of blinding on trial results: A systematic review and meta‐analysis (2023)Developing Optimal Search Strategies for Detecting Clinically Sound Studies in MEDLINE (1994)Development of a highly sensitive search strategy for the retrieval of reports of controlled trials using PubMed (2002)Optimal search strategies for retrieving scientifically strong studies of diagnosis from Medline: analytical survey (2004)Retrieving randomized controlled trials from medline : a comparison of 38 published search filters (2009)The overview of reviews: Unique challenges and opportunities when research syntheses are the principal elements of new integrative scholarship. (2012)Mindfulness for the Mental Health and Well-Being of Post-Secondary Students: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (2018)Citation Analysis as a Tool in Journal Evaluation (1972)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)Best Care at Lower Cost (2013)Musculoskeletal neck pain in children and adolescents: Risk factors and complications (2017)Text Neck Syndrome in Children and Adolescents (2021)The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data (1977)Meta-analysis in clinical trials (1986)Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses (2003)Evaluation of the Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing the risk of bias in randomized trials: focus groups, online survey, proposed recommendations and their implementation (2014)RobotReviewer: evaluation of a system for automatically assessing bias in clinical trials (2015)Development of the Anatomical Quality Assessment (AQUA) Tool for the quality assessment of anatomical studies included in meta‐analyses and systematic reviews (2016)Users' Guides to the Medical Literature (1998)Users' Guides to the Medical Literature (1999)Patient-Important Outcomes in Registered Diabetes Trials (2008)Comparison of treatment effect sizes associated with surrogate and final patient relevant outcomes in randomised controlled trials: meta-epidemiological study (2013)MISINTERPRETATION AND MISUSE OF THE KAPPA STATISTIC (1987)Tips for learners of evidence-based medicine: 1. Relative risk reduction, absolute risk reduction and number needed to treat (2004)Tips for learners of evidence-based medicine: 4. Assessing heterogeneity of primary studies in systematic reviews and whether to combine their results (2005)Validation of a GIS Facilities Database: Quantification and Implications of Error (2008)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)An evidence-based practice guideline for the peer review of electronic search strategies (2009)Using logic models to capture complexity in systematic reviews (2011)Investigation of publication bias in meta-analyses of diagnostic test accuracy: a meta-epidemiological study (2014)Scoping studies: advancing the methodology (2010)PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation (2018)Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach (2018)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2005Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework36,603 cited
  • 2008Assessing Risk of Bias in Included Studies3,395 cited
  • 2008Searching for Studies599 cited
  • 2004Tips for learners of evidence-based medicine: 3. Measures of observer variability (kappa statistic)483 cited
  • 1999Users' Guides to the Medical Literature359 cited
  • 2009Risk of bias versus quality assessment of randomised controlled trials: cross sectional study348 cited
  • 2006Developing optimal search strategies for detecting clinically sound treatment studies in EMBASE.286 cited
  • 2006An absence of pediatric randomized controlled trials in general medical journals, 1985–2004110 cited

Cited by

  • 2014A meta‐epidemiological study to examine the association between bias and treatment effects in neonatal trials46 cited
  • 2017Randomized controlled trials in children’s heart surgery in the 21st century: a systematic review27 cited
  • 2019Research Collaboration in Pediatric Critical Care Randomized Controlled Trials: A Social Network Analysis of Coauthorship*22 cited
  • 2021A multivariate model for successful publication of intensive care medicine randomized controlled trials in the highest impact factor journals: the SCOTI score14 cited
  • 2020Identification and Evaluation of Controlled Trials in Pediatric Cardiology: Crowdsourced Scoping Review and Creation of Accessible Searchable Database14 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work