Organization and the Body: Post‐Fordist Dimensions

David M. Bøje

32 citations0/0 files storedJournal of Organizational Change Management

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Management and Organizational Studies Management Theory and Practice Foucault, Power, and Ethics

Abstract

Attempts to reformulate the notion of organizational control considering the new dictates of the post‐Fordist agenda. Ideology, as a control mechanism, takes on a secondary role with the body (re‐)emerging as the ontological priority for the examination of human subjectivity, or more importantly the lack thereof. The major implication is the recognition that post‐Fordism, at least for the labour force, is nothing more than a ploy by the advocates of capital to further perpetuate control relationships. Identifies and discusses repercussions for postmodern organization “theory”.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 32 citations exist upstream.

References

1991The Condition of Postmodernity 2020Dialectic of Enlightenment 1974Labor and Monopoly Capital 1985Hegemony and Socialist Strategy 1992New reflections on the revolution of our time 1982Manufacturing Consent 1992Postmodernism and the Social Sciences 2003The Politics of Postmodernism

Cited by

1995Operationalizing the postmodernity construct for efficient organizational change management

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.