The Contents of Consciousness: Reply to Hellie, Peacocke and Siegel

David J. Chalmers

78 citations0/0 files storedAnalysis

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Philosophy and Theoretical Science Phenomenology and Existential Philosophy Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics

Abstract

This is a reply to commentaries on my book, The Character of Consciousness, by Benj Hellie, Christopher Peacocke, and Susanna Siegel. The reply to Hellie focuses on issues about acquaintance and transparency. The reply to Peacocke focuses on externalism about spatial experience. The reply to Siegel focuses on whether there can be Frege cases in perceptual experience.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 78 citations exist upstream.

References

1990The Intrinsic Quality of Experience 2010The Character of Consciousness 1903I.—THE REFUTATION OF IDEALISM 2002Representationalism and the Transparency of Experience 2012Constructing the World 2006Self-Representational Approaches to Consciousness 2013The Refutation of Idealism 2003What’s so Transparent about Transparency?

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.