Efficacy of three projective techniques in differentiating brain damage among subjects with normal IQs

Edwin E. Wagner · Patrick W. Maloney · Thomas Walter

2 citations0/0 files storedJournal of Clinical Psychology

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Psychological Testing and Assessment Deception detection and forensic psychology Historical and Modern Theater Studies

Abstract

Obtained substantial differentiation between brain-damaged (N = 25) and non-brain-damaged (N = 25) groups of average intelligence with the WAIS, Rorschach and Hand Test. The use of projective tests in diagnosing neurological impairment was encouraged, but it was cautioned that brain damage and IQ are heavily interrleated, sometimes in complex ways, and that reliable signs of organicity may vary with the Ss level of intelligence.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 2 citations exist upstream.

References

1958The Measurement and Appraisal of Adult Intelligence 1958The Measurement and Appraisal of Adult Intelligence (4th ed.).1972WAIS factor analysis with brain-damaged subjects using criterion measures.1936On the Rorschach Method and its Application in Organic Disturbances of the Central Nervous System.1964WAIS performances of brain damaged and neurotic patients 1978Differentiation of Brain Damage Among Low IQ Subjects With Three Projective Techniques

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.