Peer-Review Publication Patterns: A Comparison of International Radiography Journals

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Evidence-based practice is an expectation of all health care professionals, and the unique knowledge base of a profession is established through research and synthesis and most commonly shared through peer-review publication. The number of peer-review radiography journals has been increasing, and this bibliometric study aims to review the radiography profession in terms of these publications to explore the evidence base and identify its evolution internationally. METHOD: Four peer-review journals were examined over an eight-year period (2004-2011): the Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences, Radiography, The South African Radiographer, and The Radiographer. The number and nationality of authors were collected, with whole counting of authors. Specific metrics allowed examination of author collaboration. Analysis of article type and subject enabled comparison of research and publication trends at the journal, author, and country levels. RESULTS: Eight hundred thirty-five articles met the inclusion criteria, with 1,999 contributing authors and 43 countries represented. Differences in the type of articles were also evident, with research predominating. The data demonstrated an increase in the total number of authors contributing to individual articles, with resultant larger collaborative groups. Overall research articles comprised almost half of the articles published (410/835; 49.1%). In relation to subject, just over half of the articles were focused on a clinical practice topic (427/835; 51.1%), with the majority presenting research findings (228/427; 53.4%). CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that radiography journal publication is active internationally. Research-focused and clinical practice articles predominate, but it is important that the area of radiography does not become complacent.

Cite this work

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 13 citations exist upstream.

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.