SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
A comparative study of research performance in nanotechnology for China’s inventor–authors and their non-inventing peers
16 references·12 citing·42 second hop
A comparative study of research performance in nanotechnology for China’s inventor–authors and their non-inventing peers (2010)A comparative study of research performan…Worldwide nanotechnology development: a comparative study of USPTO, EPO, and JPO patents (1976–2004) (2007)Worldwide nanotechnology deve…Refining search terms for nanotechnology (2007)Refining search terms for nan…Nanotechnology as a field of science: Its delineation in terms of journals and patents (2007)Nanotechnology as a field of …Global nanotechnology research metrics (2007)Global nanotechnology researc…China's emerging presence in nanoscience and nanotechnology (2007)China's emerging presence in …University patenting and its effects on academic research: The emerging European evidence (2006)University patenting and its …Are patenting scientists the better scholars? (2006)Are patenting scientists the …An informetric model for the Hirsch-index (2006)An informetric model for the …The emergence of China as a leading nation in science (2005)The emergence of China as a l…An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output (2005)An index to quantify an indiv…The Triple Helix of university-industry-government relations (2003)The Triple Helix of universit…Publications and patents in nanotechnology (2003)Publications and patents in n…Universities and the global knowledge economy : a triple helix of university-industry-government relations (2002)Universities and the global k…Measuring China"s research performance using the Science Citation Index (2002)Measuring China"s research pe…Nanoscience and nanotecnology on the balance (1997)Nanoscience and nanotecnology…Citation Analysis as a Tool in Journal Evaluation (1972)Citation Analysis as a Tool i…Do academic inventors have diverse interests? (2023)Do academic inventors have di…Knowledge production patterns of China and the US: quantum technology (2022)Knowledge production patterns…Identifying tacit university-industry collaborations in Chinese patents based on inventor-author analysis (2020)Identifying tacit university-…Influential factors of national and regional CO2 emission in China based on combined model of DPSIR and PLS-SEM (2018)Influential factors of nation…Is the prominent scientist the one who becomes an inventor? A matching of Swedish academic pairs in nanoscience to examine the effect of publishing on patenting (2017)Is the prominent scientist th…Torn between Academic Publications and University–Industry Collaboration (2016)Torn between Academic Publica…Mapping research spotlights for different regions in China (2016)Mapping research spotlights f…A bilateral comparison of research performance at an institutional level (2015)A bilateral comparison of res…Value chain of nanotechnology: a comparative study of some major players (2012)Value chain of nanotechnology…Love dynamics between science and technology: some evidences in nanoscience and nanotechnology (2012)Love dynamics between science…Profiling leading scientists in nanobiomedical science: interdisciplinarity and potential leading indicators of research directions (2011)Profiling leading scientists …Modeling the dynamic relation between science and technology in nanotechnology (2011)Modeling the dynamic relation…The New production of knowledge: the dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies (1995)The New Production of Knowledge: The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies. (1995)Creating entrepreneurial universities : organizational pathways of transformation (1998)Tracing the links between science and technology: An exploratory analysis of scientists’ and inventors’ networks (2009)Evidence on how academics manage their portfolio of knowledge transfer activities (2010)Nanoscience and technology publications and patents: a review of social science studies and search strategies (2010)Little Science, Big Science (1963)Comparison of the Hirsch-index with standard bibliometric indicators and with peer judgment for 147 chemistry research groups (2006)Scaling the h-index for different scientific ISI fields (2007)The Hirsch index and related impact measures (2010)The Science of Literature Reviews: Searching, Identifying, Selecting, and Synthesising (2023)Networks of Scientific Papers (1965)The History and Meaning of the Journal Impact Factor (2006)What do citation counts measure? A review of studies on citing behavior (2008)Making PCR: A Story of Biotechnology (1998)Objectives, Characteristics and Outcomes of University Licensing: A Survey of Major U.S. Universities (2001)The growth of patenting and licensing by U.S. universities: an assessment of the effects of the Bayh–Dole act of 1980 (2001)Applying social network analysis in economic geography: framing some key analytic issues (2008)The Governance of University Knowledge Transfer: A Critical Review of the Literature (2009)The nature of academic entrepreneurship in the UK: Widening the focus on entrepreneurial activities (2012)Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research (1997)The scientific impact of nations (2004)Detecting emerging research fronts based on topological measures in citation networks of scientific publications (2008)Informetrics at the beginning of the 21st century—A review (2008)Scientific instrumentation and university research (1992)Does science push technology? Patents citing scientific literature (2000)Minerva unbound: Knowledge stocks, knowledge flows and new knowledge production (2007)Trajectory patterns of technology fusion: Trend analysis and taxonomical grouping in nanobiotechnology (2009)The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge. (1967)An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change. (1983)The dynamics of innovation: from National Systems and “Mode 2” to a Triple Helix of university–industry–government relations (2000)Publication and patent behavior of academic researchers: Conflicting, reinforcing or merely co-existing? (2006)Theorizing the Triple Helix model: Past, present, and future (2020)Higher education and its communities: Interconnections, interdependencies and a research agenda (2008)Trends in Global Higher Education: Tracking an Academic Revolution (2010)Triple Helix Systems: An Analytical Framework for Innovation Policy and Practice in the Knowledge Society (2013)Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics (2015)The bibliometric analysis of scholarly production: How great is the impact? (2015)bibliometrix : An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis (2017)Assessing the nature of nanotechnology: can we uncover an emerging general purpose technology? (2007)Is the United States losing ground in science? A global perspective on the world science system (2008)How interdisciplinary is nanotechnology? (2009)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2005An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output11,612 cited
  • 1972Citation Analysis as a Tool in Journal Evaluation2,781 cited
  • 2002Universities and the global knowledge economy : a triple helix of university-industry-government relations1,205 cited
  • 2006University patenting and its effects on academic research: The emerging European evidence619 cited
  • 2005The emergence of China as a leading nation in science541 cited
  • 2007Refining search terms for nanotechnology358 cited
  • 2003The Triple Helix of university-industry-government relations339 cited
  • 2006An informetric model for the Hirsch-index303 cited
  • 2003Publications and patents in nanotechnology216 cited
  • 2006Are patenting scientists the better scholars?200 cited
  • 1997Nanoscience and nanotecnology on the balance192 cited
  • 2007China's emerging presence in nanoscience and nanotechnology172 cited
  • 2002Measuring China"s research performance using the Science Citation Index144 cited
  • 2007Nanotechnology as a field of science: Its delineation in terms of journals and patents113 cited
  • 2007Worldwide nanotechnology development: a comparative study of USPTO, EPO, and JPO patents (1976–2004)

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

90 cited
  • 2007Global nanotechnology research metrics69 cited
  • Cited by

    • 2018Influential factors of national and regional CO2 emission in China based on combined model of DPSIR and PLS-SEM102 cited
    • 2016Mapping research spotlights for different regions in China25 cited
    • 2011Profiling leading scientists in nanobiomedical science: interdisciplinarity and potential leading indicators of research directions23 cited
    • 2016Torn between Academic Publications and University–Industry Collaboration20 cited
    • 2012Value chain of nanotechnology: a comparative study of some major players18 cited
    • 2012Love dynamics between science and technology: some evidences in nanoscience and nanotechnology14 cited
    • 2011Modeling the dynamic relation between science and technology in nanotechnology13 cited
    • 2017Is the prominent scientist the one who becomes an inventor? A matching of Swedish academic pairs in nanoscience to examine the effect of publishing on patenting12 cited
    • 2022Knowledge production patterns of China and the US: quantum technology12 cited
    • 2023Do academic inventors have diverse interests?12 cited
    • 2015A bilateral comparison of research performance at an institutional level11 cited
    • 2020Identifying tacit university-industry collaborations in Chinese patents based on inventor-author analysis7 cited