Socrates and Hedonism: Protagoras 351b-358d

Donald J. Zeyl

107 citations0/0 files storedPhronesis

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Classical Philosophy and Thought Classical Antiquity Studies Classical Studies and Philology

Abstract

The weight of the evidence is heavily in favor of the antihedonist reading of the Protagoras. It is thoroughly compatible with the text of the Protagoras; it is intelligible in the light of a plausible account of Socrates' aims; and it can meet objections to it, whereas the prohedonist account creates more problems than it solves.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 107 citations exist upstream.

References

1980Plato's Moral Theory: The Early and Middle Dialogues

Cited by

1995Plato's Ethics 2009The Sophist on Statements, Predication, and Falsehood 2008The Oxford Handbook of Plato 2009Plato's Epistemology 2008Trials of Reason 1985Happiness and virtue in Socrates' moral theory 2009Plato's Philosophy of Language 2009Plato in his Time and Place

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.