No open-access location is known for this record yet.
No open-access location is known for this record yet.
This essay is a comparative analysis of Esfir Shub's late 1920s compilation documentaries and Santiago Álvarez's early 1970s chronicle films. Despite their apparent formal differences, Shub's and Álvarez's works can be seen as responding to a comparable set of sociopolitical and cultural conditions that manifest themselves in similar methodological and aesthetic choices. Recent work by historians of science provides a framework for understanding Shub's and Álvarez's shift toward a more "restrained" cinema as one that continues to embrace visions of social and political transformation.
Loading…
Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 6 citations exist upstream.
Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.
Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.